Power of Niagara Falls: How Many 80 W Bulbs Can It Power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Unknown_20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the power generated by the water flow at Niagara Falls, which has a mass flow rate of 1.38 x 10^6 kg/s and a drop height of 32 m. Using the formula for force (mass times acceleration) and the relationship between power, work, and time, participants explore how to determine the total power output. The calculations involve converting the work done into watts to find out how many 80 W light bulbs can be powered. The conversation emphasizes the application of Newton's second law and the principles of energy conversion. Ultimately, the discussion aims to quantify the immense energy potential of Niagara Falls in terms of electrical power generation.
Unknown_20
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Water flows over a section of Niagara Falls at
a rate of 1.38 x 10^6 kg/s and falls 32 m.
The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s2 .
How many 80 W bulbs can be lit with this
power?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unknown_20 said:
Water flows over a section of Niagara Falls at
a rate of 1.38 x 10^6 kg/s and falls 32 m.
The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s2 .
How many 80 W bulbs can be lit with this
power?

Force = Mass*Acceleration, which in this case will be in Newtons.
P = Force*distance / time, note that force*distance is also called "work" and the units of work are "Joules". A watt is Joules over time, which is exactely what this equation comes up with.

That should be all you need to know.
 
thanks for the help.
 
If i am not mistaken, here we have to use Newton's second law in real form that's
f=d/dt(m*v)
here velocity is not the variable but the mass (check kg/s)
work done = f*d/time

you can do the rest.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top