Power of Wavefront Penetrating Dielectric Material

DemoniWaari
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How large proportion of wavefront's power penetrates dielectric material's surface in a perpendicular collision from air. The only parameter that I have is \varepsilon_r = 16 where \varepsilon_r is the relative permittivity.

Homework Equations


\varepsilon = \varepsilon_r \varepsilon_0
\eta = \sqrt{\frac{\mu}{\varepsilon}} Where \mu = \mu_0 Because of the dielectric material.
\vec E(\vec r) = \vec E_0 e^{-j \vec k \cdot \vec r}
\vec H(\vec r) = \frac{1}{\eta} \vec E_{0p} e^{-j \vec k \cdot \vec r} Where \vec E_{0p} is perpendicular to \vec E_0 and has the same magnitude.
\vec S(\vec r) = \frac{1}{2} \vec E(\vec r) \times \vec H(\vec r)^{*} The complex poyinting vector.

The Attempt at a Solution



\vec E_+(\vec r) = \vec E_0 e^{-j \vec k_1 \cdot \vec r} wavefront in the air.
And
\vec E_-(\vec r) = \vec E_0 e^{-j \vec k_2 \cdot \vec r} wavefront in the material
And \eta_1 = \sqrt{\varepsilon_0 \mu_0} is the wave impedance.
Thus we get
\vec H_+(\vec r) = \frac{1}{\eta_1} \vec E_{0p} e^{-j \vec k_1 \cdot \vec r}
And
\vec H_-(\vec r) = \frac{1}{\eta_2} \vec E_{0p} e^{-j \vec k_2 \cdot \vec r}
Now the complex poyinting vectors are
\vec S_+(\vec r) = \frac{1}{2} \vec E_+(\vec r) \times \vec H_+(\vec r)^{*}
We're not interested in the directions so we can just check the magnitudes thus we get.
\vec S_+(\vec r) = \frac{1}{2\eta_1} |E_0|^2
And same thing for the other wavefront...
\vec S_-(\vec r) = \frac{1}{2\eta_2} |E_0|^2

So the passing fraction is
\frac{ \vec S_-(\vec r)}{\vec S_+(\vec r)} =<br /> \frac{\frac{1}{\eta_2}}{\frac{1}{\eta_1}} = \frac{\eta_1}{\eta_2} =<br /> \frac{\sqrt{\frac{\mu_0}{\varepsilon_0}}}<br /> {\sqrt{ \frac{\mu_0}{\varepsilon_r \varepsilon_0} }} = \sqrt{\epsilon_r}=4

So interestingly output is four times higher than input... So I have a problem here =(
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest to use [itex.] rather than [tex.] or the latex will be displayed on a new line for each expression.
When you close the [itex.], use [/itex.] rather than [\itex.]. This is the reason why it doesn't work.
Without the . inside the []'s.
 
OH YES!
Thank you kind sir.
 
Penetrated power = incident power minus reflected power.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...

Similar threads

Back
Top