Power Radiation Ratio of Venus and Earth

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the power radiation ratio between Earth and Venus, treating both as black bodies. The mean surface temperatures are 600K for Venus and 300K for Earth, leading to a calculated ratio of power radiated per unit area of 1/16. The area factor cancels out because the problem specifically asks for power per unit area, which is defined by the Stefan-Boltzmann law (σT^4). Clarifications were provided regarding the use of the same surface area for both planets in the calculation. The final understanding confirms that the area does not affect the ratio when considering power per unit area.
rnjscksdyd
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Venus and Earth may be regarded as behaving as black bodies. The mean temperature at the surface of Venus is about 600K and at the surface of Earth is about 300K. Which of the following is the best estimate for the ratio
\frac{power.radiated.per.unit.area.on.Earth}{power.radiated.per.unit.area.on.Venus}

(A) 1/2
(B) 1/4
(C) 1/8
(D) 1/16

I had to put dots in between words.. It won't let me space them

Homework Equations


σAT^4


The Attempt at a Solution


Venus: σAT^4 = σA(600)^4
Earth: σAT^4 = σA(300)^4

The actual answer is (D)
and I got this by
\frac{σA(300)^4}{σA(600)^4}=1/16

If the above working is right, I want to know where 'A' or 'Area' disappeared to. I thought Area of Earth and Venus are different so they can't cancel out? Or is power radiated always referring to the unit surface area, or 1m^2 ?

p.s. sorry for asking too many questions, my exam is next week :(
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
rnjscksdyd said:

Homework Statement


Venus and Earth may be regarded as behaving as black bodies. The mean temperature at the surface of Venus is about 600K and at the surface of Earth is about 300K. Which of the following is the best estimate for the ratio
\frac{power.radiated.per.unit.area.on.Earth}{power.radiated.per.unit.area.on.Venus}

(A) 1/2
(B) 1/4
(C) 1/8
(D) 1/16

I had to put dots in between words.. It won't let me space them
Here is how to do it:
\frac{\text{power radiated per unit area on Earth}}{\text{power radiated per unit area on Venus}}
\frac{\text{power radiated per unit area on Earth}}{\text{power radiated per unit area on Venus}}

Although it looks kind of ugly here.

Homework Equations


σAT^4

If the above working is right, I want to know where 'A' or 'Area' disappeared to. I thought Area of Earth and Venus are different so they can't cancel out? Or is power radiated always referring to the unit surface area, or 1m^2 ?
Assuming there are no losses, as is presumably the case in this problem, you can calculate or measure the flux through any closed surface, so you can pick the same surface for both Venus and Earth. Note that the question asks not for the total power, but the power per unit area, which is just \sigma T^4 in both cases.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
tms said:
Here is how to do it:
\frac{\text{power radiated per unit area on Earth}}{\text{power radiated per unit area on Venus}}
\frac{\text{power radiated per unit area on Earth}}{\text{power radiated per unit area on Venus}}

Although it looks kind of ugly here.




Assuming there are no losses, as is presumably the case in this problem, you can calculate or measure the flux through any closed surface, so you can pick the same surface for both Venus and Earth. Note that the question asks not for the total power, but the power per unit area, which is just \sigma T^4 in both cases.

I get it now! :D thank you so much ;D
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top