Power required the support a helicopter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the power required to support a rescue helicopter with a mass of 810 kg, which imparts a downward velocity to the air. The first part of the problem is solved with a velocity of 11.5 m/s, but the second part regarding power remains unclear. The power formula presented involves a term with velocity raised to the third power, leading to confusion about its derivation. Participants emphasize the importance of using established physics principles, like the impulse-momentum equation, rather than guessing. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in problem-solving methods and understanding the physics behind the calculations.
Doyouevenlift
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
A rescue helicopter of mass 810 kg, supports itself in a stationary position by imparting
a downward velocity, v, to the air in a circle of radius 4.0 m. The density of the air is
1.20 kg m-3.

Calculate:
(i) the value of v
(ii) the power, P, required to support the helicopter


So, I do have the solution to part one, which is 11.5 ms-1. However, the solution for ii eludes me. The answer sheet does something weird:

Power = 0.5(pi*4^2)(1.2)v^3. From the first term I'm guessing they're using E=.5mv^2, but why is the velocity raised to the third?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
"I'm guessing" is not the way to solve problems in physics.

This problem can be solved by using the impulse-momentum equation.
 
voko said:
"I'm guessing" is not the way to solve problems in physics.

This problem can be solved by using the impulse-momentum equation.

That's why I asked it, you arrogant person.
 
I do not think I was or am being arrogant. I pointed out that guessing how the problem is solved from the answer, as you tried to, is almost never productive.

On the other hand, you did not demonstrate any other attempt at solving the problem, as is required in this forum.
 
voko said:
I do not think I was or am being arrogant. I pointed out that guessing how the problem is solved from the answer, as you tried to, is almost never productive.

On the other hand, you did not demonstrate any other attempt at solving the problem, as is required in this forum.

My attempt was just using kinetic energy, and my question was why the answer sheet has taken velocity to the third power, which hasn't been answered yet.
 
What is the total mass of the air propelled by the helicopter in one second? What is the kinetic energy of that mass?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top