Solving (x-6)(x+7)/(x-2) ≥ 0 & log(base 3)x + log(base 3)(x-6) = 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Help_Me_Please
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the inequality (x-6)(x+7)/(x-2) ≥ 0, critical points are identified at x=2, x=6, and x=-7, leading to intervals that are tested for positivity. The solution to the inequality is found to be (-∞, -7] ∪ [2, 6] ∪ (6, ∞). For the equation log(base 3)x + log(base 3)(x-6) = 3, the logarithmic properties allow simplification to log(base 3)(x(x-6)) = 3. This is rewritten in exponential form as 3^3 = x(x-6), yielding potential solutions x=9 and x=-3. Only x=9 is valid upon checking against the original equation, confirming it as the sole solution.
Help_Me_Please
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
This should be rather easy for the rest of you .. but somehow I can't remember what to do.

solve
[ (x-6) (x+7) ] / (x-2) is greater than or equal to 0

and

solve

log(base three)x + log(base three)(x-6) = 3

ty in advance =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what have you done so far?

\frac{(x-6)(x+7)}{x-2} \geq 0
what are the critical numbers( make numerator 0 or denominator 0)

Then form your test intervals and you get the answer.

for \log_3x + \log_3(x-6) = 3 use log rules

hint: \log_bxy = log_bx + log_by
 
Last edited:


To solve (x-6)(x+7)/(x-2) ≥ 0, we can start by finding the critical points, which are the values of x that make the inequality equal to 0 or undefined. In this case, the critical points are x=2, x=6, and x=-7.

Next, we can create a number line and plot these critical points on it. Then, we can test a value in each of the intervals created by these points to see if it satisfies the inequality. For example, testing x=0 in the interval (-∞, -7) would give us a negative result, so this interval would not satisfy the inequality. Similarly, testing x=4 in the interval (-7, 2) would give us a positive result, so this interval would satisfy the inequality.

Therefore, the solution to the inequality is (-∞, -7] ∪ [2, 6] ∪ (6, ∞). This means that all values of x in these intervals will make the inequality true.

To solve log(base 3)x + log(base 3)(x-6) = 3, we can use the logarithmic properties to simplify the equation. First, we can combine the two logarithms using the product rule, which states that log(a) + log(b) = log(ab). In this case, we get log(base 3)(x(x-6)) = 3.

Next, we can rewrite the equation in exponential form, which states that log(base a)b = c is equivalent to a^c = b. In this case, we get 3^3 = x(x-6).

Solving for x, we get x=9 or x=-3. However, we have to check these solutions in the original equation to make sure they are valid. Plugging in x=9 gives us log(base 3)9 + log(base 3)(9-6) = 3, which is true. However, plugging in x=-3 gives us log(base 3)(-3) + log(base 3)(-3-6) = 3, which is not defined.

Therefore, the only valid solution is x=9.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top