Predict the equation for the period of a pendulum

  • Thread starter Thread starter soccergirl14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum Period
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the equation for the period of a pendulum based on experimental observations. It was noted that neither mass nor horizontal displacement affects the pendulum's period, while the length does show a proportional relationship when period squared is graphed against length. The equation of motion for the pendulum was derived using torque and moment of inertia, leading to the formula T² = kL. Participants suggested taking the square root of both sides to express the period T in terms of length L. The conversation concludes with appreciation for the derivation and guidance provided.
soccergirl14
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I did a lab on pendulums and I need to answer the following:
Examine the experimental evidence in regards to each of the properties of the pendulum, mass, horizontal displacement and length. Predict the equation for the period of a pendulum and calculate it based on your observations.

The data I have to work with is:
-I have different horizontal displacements and the periods for each displacement
-I have different masses and the periods for each mass
-I have different pendulum lengths and the periods for each length

In this lab, I observed that neither the horizontal displacement or the mass had an effect on the period of a pendulum.


I found this page ( http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/pend.html#c4 ) that works out the steps for deriving the period of a pendulum, but I, nor any classmates of mine, have been introduced to calculus yet so I am assuming that is not the way I am supossed to derive this equation.

I graphed out the period squared vs the pendulum length and they are proportional.

If anyone could help with with some sort of direction to go in creating the equation of a pendulum I would really appreciate it!
Thanks (:
 
Physics news on Phys.org


So I am guessing that you are asking for the equation of motion for the pendulum.

Start out with the first law for torque

T = I\alpha

For the pendulum the moment of intertia is

I = L^2m

So what are the torques on the pendulum? If you draw out the free body diagram (or look on the site) and use a little trignometry you find that there is one due to gravity

T = -mgL\sin\theta

Combining the two equations gives you

L^2m\alpha = -mgL\sin\theta

Now here is the one part where a very little bit of calculus comes in. Acceleration is the second derivative of displacement with respect to time. This can be written

\alpha = \frac{d^2\theta}{dt}

Another relation you need to use is that for small angles the following is true

\sin\theta = \theta

Combing the previous three equations and rearranging gives

\frac{d^2\theta}{dt} + \frac{g}{L}\theta = 0

Which is the equation of motion for the pendulum.
 


I graphed out the period squared vs the pendulum length and they are proportional.
Then you have the formula: T² = kL
(the quantity on the vertical axis = slope x quantity on horizontal axis)
It would be nice to express the slope constant in terms of g, but that would be working backward from the answer. Unless you have the means to do the experiment under different g conditions!
 


I think I may have been unclear in my explanation, I THINK I am trying to get to the equation:
b3129742fed41e2f6d2e6962c78a3cdc.png

Is there any way I can get there from T^2=kL?
Or am I completely in the wrong direction?

Thanks for the replies (:
 


Take the square root of both sides.
You might compare your slope value with the 4π²/g from the formula and find the % difference.

Mbaboy, that is the nicest derivation of the formula I've seen! Thank you very much.
 


Delphi51 said:
Take the square root of both sides.
You might compare your slope value with the 4π²/g from the formula and find the % difference.

Mbaboy, that is the nicest derivation of the formula I've seen! Thank you very much.

I think that will work out quite nicely!
thank you very much for your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top