How Does the Normal Force on a Rock in Water Differ with Varying Water Levels?

AI Thread Summary
The normal force on a rock submerged in water is calculated as Mg/2, where M is the mass of the rock and g is the acceleration due to gravity. This is derived by considering the buoyant force, which is equal to the weight of the water displaced by the rock, and subtracting it from the gravitational force acting on the rock. The discussion raises a question about whether the normal force changes with varying water levels, suggesting that the pressure from the water above could affect it. However, it is clarified that the normal force remains consistent as long as the rock is resting on the bottom of the tank, regardless of water depth. The principles of buoyancy and pressure are explained through Archimedes' principle and Bernoulli's equation, confirming that the normal force does not vary with water level in this scenario.
phrygian
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rock of mass M with a density twice that of water is sitting on the bottom of an aquarium tank filled with water. The normal force exerted on the rock by the bottom of the tank is?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is Mg/2, I understand how to arrive at that by subtracting the buoyant force which is equal to mg from the gravitational force on the object which is 2mg. but shouldn't the normal force on the object be different when there are different amounts of water pushing down on it? Since the amount of water is not given shouldn't the correct answer be "impossible to determine from the information given?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi phrygian. Are you familiar with the Archeimedes' principal? Let's not talk about "amount" of something. Let's give everything a specific, measurable quantity such as "volume" or "mass". Archimedes' principal simply states that any object, wholly or partly immersed in a fluid, is buoyed up by a force equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the object.

So the rock displaces some volume of water which has a given weight.

Does that help?
 
I understand that but if I make a free body diagram for the rock wouldn't the forces be normal force + bouyant force - gravitational force - force due to pressure from the fluid above = 0 ? So doesn't the normal force change as the force due to pressure from the fluid above changes when there are different amounts of fluid above?
 
A free body diagram of the forces on the object in the water would consist of the forces down (weight of object) minus the forces up (integrate pressure over the area). This can be simplifed if we imagine a cubical volume. Forces on the sides cancel out. Force on top equals pressure times area. Force on bottom equals pressure times area. Use Bernoulli's equation to determine pressure. The force up (difference in pressure times area) minus the force down (weight) equals the weight of the fluid, which is exactly what Archimedes' principal tells us.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top