Pressure drop does not match theory

Click For Summary
The user modeled a U-Pipe with laminar flow using Fluent but observed a pressure drop of 3 kPa, while theoretical calculations suggest it should be 6 kPa. Discussions revealed potential issues with the friction factor estimation or simulation settings in Fluent, particularly regarding laminar versus turbulent flow assumptions. The user confirmed their Reynolds number indicates laminar flow, yet discrepancies persisted even when modeling with water. Ultimately, it was discovered that the simulation results were accurate only when the geometry was modeled as axisymmetric, raising questions about how to implement this for a U-shaped pipe. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proper modeling techniques in computational fluid dynamics to align simulation results with theoretical predictions.
  • #31
akbarff5 said:
can help me how to show pressure drop value in ansys fluent:wink::wink:
Please read the Rules and Guidelines for Physics Forums. If you want you questions answered on a subject different from that in a particular thread, merely start a new thread. Make sure you choose a descriptive title to attract members' attention, and clearly explain in detail what your problem is. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
51K
Replies
7
Views
9K