1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Pressure in a neutron star

  1. Jan 1, 2010 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Assuming a neutron star is made from an incompressible material, what is the hydraulic pressure 50m below the surface?

    Mass = 1.98x10^30kg
    Radius = 10km

    2. The attempt at a solution

    g=GM/r^2 = (6.67x10^-11 x 1.98x10^30)/ 10000^2 = 1.32x10^12 m/s^2

    P=P[tex]_{0}[/tex] + [tex]\rho[/tex]gh Pa

    [tex]\rho[/tex] = m/v = 1.98x10^30 / (4/3 x pi x 10000^3) = 4.73x10^17 kg/m^3

    If pressure in space is 0 Pa, then P = 0 + 4.73x10^17 x 1.32x10^12 x 50

    = 3.12x10^31 Pa

    Is this correct? Thank for your time!

    Edit: I think it might be wrong because my equation assumes that space (as a vacuum) and the star are one material (?) :s.
     
    Last edited: Jan 1, 2010
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 1, 2010 #2
    Use the differential equation of hydrostatic equilibrium:

    [tex]\frac{dP}{dh} = -\rho g[/tex]

    Remember that the gravitational acceleration [tex]g[/tex] changes with [tex]h[/tex]
    In your calculation, you assumed that it was constant and equal to the surface gravitation. That is incorrect.
    [tex]\rho[/tex], on the other hand, is constant as the star is incompressible.
     
  4. Jan 1, 2010 #3
    Thanks, for your reply. Here is my second attempt:

    dP = - [tex]\rho[/tex]gdh

    [tex]\frac{dP}{dh}[/tex] = -[tex]\rho[/tex]g

    [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\frac{dP}{dh}[/tex]dh = [tex]\int[/tex]-[tex]\rho[/tex]gdh

    P = -[tex]\rho[/tex]GM[tex]\int[/tex][tex]\frac{1}{r^{2}}[/tex]dh between 10000 and 9950

    P = -[tex]\rho[/tex]GM [[tex]\frac{1}{r}[/tex]] 10000...9950

    = -[tex]\rho[/tex]GM [[tex]\frac{1}{10000}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{9950}[/tex]]

    =3.14x10[tex]^{31}[/tex] Pa

    I apologize for integrating r with respect to h, if that was confusing.
     
    Last edited: Jan 1, 2010
  5. Jan 1, 2010 #4
    That too is incorrect. ;) Though you're on the right track!

    Remember that a spherical shell contributes no [tex]\frac{1}{r^2}[/tex] field inwards. That is to say, when calculating the gravitational field inside the star at a radius [tex]r_0<R[/tex], you must only regard the contribution of the mass inside, at radii [tex]0<r<r_0[/tex], as all the mass on the outside contributes nothing to the gravitational field!
     
  6. Jan 1, 2010 #5
    OK, I've got it, thanks RoyalCat!
     
  7. Jan 1, 2010 #6
    You're welcome!

    As a hint, the gravitational field rises linearly with the radius inside the star, in case you happen to get anything different.
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook