Calculating Hydraulic Pressure in a Neutron Star

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the hydraulic pressure 50 meters below the surface of a neutron star, assuming it is incompressible. Initial calculations incorrectly assumed constant gravitational acceleration, leading to an erroneous pressure value of 3.12x10^31 Pa. Participants highlighted the need to use hydrostatic equilibrium and consider the gravitational field's variation with depth. The correct approach involves integrating the gravitational field, which increases linearly within the star, and only accounting for the mass inside the radius of interest. Ultimately, the pressure calculation requires careful consideration of these factors for accuracy.
j-e_c
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Assuming a neutron star is made from an incompressible material, what is the hydraulic pressure 50m below the surface?

Mass = 1.98x10^30kg
Radius = 10km

2. The attempt at a solution

g=GM/r^2 = (6.67x10^-11 x 1.98x10^30)/ 10000^2 = 1.32x10^12 m/s^2

P=P_{0} + \rhogh Pa

\rho = m/v = 1.98x10^30 / (4/3 x pi x 10000^3) = 4.73x10^17 kg/m^3

If pressure in space is 0 Pa, then P = 0 + 4.73x10^17 x 1.32x10^12 x 50

= 3.12x10^31 Pa

Is this correct? Thank for your time!

Edit: I think it might be wrong because my equation assumes that space (as a vacuum) and the star are one material (?) :s.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the differential equation of hydrostatic equilibrium:

\frac{dP}{dh} = -\rho g

Remember that the gravitational acceleration g changes with h
In your calculation, you assumed that it was constant and equal to the surface gravitation. That is incorrect.
\rho, on the other hand, is constant as the star is incompressible.
 
Thanks, for your reply. Here is my second attempt:

dP = - \rhogdh

\frac{dP}{dh} = -\rhog

\int\frac{dP}{dh}dh = \int-\rhogdh

P = -\rhoGM\int\frac{1}{r^{2}}dh between 10000 and 9950

P = -\rhoGM [\frac{1}{r}] 10000...9950

= -\rhoGM [\frac{1}{10000}-\frac{1}{9950}]

=3.14x10^{31} Pa

I apologize for integrating r with respect to h, if that was confusing.
 
Last edited:
That too is incorrect. ;) Though you're on the right track!

Remember that a spherical shell contributes no \frac{1}{r^2} field inwards. That is to say, when calculating the gravitational field inside the star at a radius r_0<R, you must only regard the contribution of the mass inside, at radii 0<r<r_0, as all the mass on the outside contributes nothing to the gravitational field!
 
OK, I've got it, thanks RoyalCat!
 
j-e_c said:
OK, I've got it, thanks RoyalCat!

You're welcome!

As a hint, the gravitational field rises linearly with the radius inside the star, in case you happen to get anything different.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top