Pressure in Fluids: Conceptual Q & Maths Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter crazy student
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluids Pressure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of pressure in fluids, particularly whether pressure is equal in all directions at a given depth. It is established that while pressure varies with height, the isotropy condition indicates that pressure should be the same in all directions at a point in a fluid at rest. This isotropic behavior arises from the kinetic energy distribution of fluid particles, which leads to equal pressure exerted in all directions. The conversation emphasizes that pressure is a scalar quantity and does not have directional properties like horizontal or vertical pressure. Ultimately, the equality of pressure in all directions is a fundamental characteristic of fluids, supported by both experimental observations and theoretical frameworks.
crazy student
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have a conceptual question about fluid...
we derive the equations about pressure in fluid by considering the mass above a particular point in fluid.
and for fluid at rest, the pressure above equals pressure from below.
how about on the perpendicular plane? is the pressure on the sides equal to pressure from above and below also?
my textbook says that 'At any point in a fluid at rest, the pressure is the same in all directions at a given depth',
is it an experimental statement or can it be shown mathematically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the pressure was not the same on either side of your fluid "element", there would be an unbalanced (net) lateral force on it, and it would move. The fact that we're considering hydrostatics means that must not happen.
 
crazy student said:
is the pressure on the sides equal to pressure from above and below also?

To tackle this specific point, the whole point of the analysis was to show that pressure varies only with height. Since "above", "below", and "on the sides", generally describes three different heights, I don't see why the pressure would be the same at any of these points. For instance, you already know that the pressure below is higher than the pressure above, so how could the pressure on the sides be equal to the pressure "above and below"?!
 
cepheid said:
If the pressure was not the same on either side of your fluid "element", there would be an unbalanced (net) lateral force on it, and it would move. The fact that we're considering hydrostatics means that must not happen.

But this is not sufficient to demonstrate that the horizontal pressure is the same as the vertical pressure. It only requires that horizontal pressure be the same in two sets of opposite directions and that vertical pressure be the same in both directions, not that they all be equal. The equality in all directions is unique to fluids. It is certainly not a requirement for solids.

I think you would have to look microscopically at the nature of fluids and get into the statistical mechanics of ensembles of particles to justify the statement of equal pressure in all directions. The pressure is the same in all directions because the kinetic energy distribution of the particles in a fluid is isotropic. The interaction of an infinitesimal volume of fluid with its surroundings will involve collisions of energetic particles with isotropic momentum distribution, etc etc etc
 
OlderDan said:
But this is not sufficient to demonstrate that the horizontal pressure is the same as the vertical pressure.
Pressure is a scalar. It has no direction, so there's no such things as horizontal and vertical pressure.
 
OldeDan is correct, what we have to show is that the scalar pressure, p=p(x,y,z,t)
at most, and not p(x,y,z,t,\vec{n}) where \vec{n} is the normal to the surface element we're looking at, at the point (x,y,z) at time t
This is not completely trivial, since forces would balance on either side of a surface, as long as p were an even function of \vec{n}
Since, then:
p(\vec{x},t,\vec{n})\vec{n}dA+p(\vec{x},t,-\vec{n})(-\vec{n})dA=\vec{0}
The condition that the pressure does not depend on the orientation of the local surface element is called the isotropy condition.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top