Pressure on Piston: Conservation of Energy Explained

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of pressure in relation to a piston exerting force on water. It clarifies that pressure is an intensive property, meaning it does not sum like extensive properties; thus, the pressure on the piston remains P = F/S, not P = N*F/S. The confusion arises from misunderstanding that pressure represents force per unit area and is uniform across the surface in equilibrium. Additionally, it emphasizes that in a system with multiple forces, such as pistons acting on a trapezoid, the pressures must be equal for equilibrium, reinforcing the need to apply hydrostatic principles correctly. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding pressure as a local property rather than a cumulative one.
CGandC
Messages
326
Reaction score
34

Homework Statement


Suppose there is a tank filled with water and a piston of area S exerts a force F on the water.
upload_2018-6-11_23-15-46.png

Suppose I divide the water boundary touching the piston to - N small equal " square " molecules.
Then , the force on the upper face of each molecule is F/N .
Also, the area of the upper face of each molecule is of length S/N .
Thus , the pressure on each molecule touching the piston is : ## P = \frac{F/N}{S/N} = \frac{F}{S} ##
And this is the same pressure that each molecule exerts on the piston

Question: If ## P = \frac{F}{S} ## is also the pressure that each molecule ( touching the piston ) exerts on the piston, then , if I sum the pressures exerted by each such molecule on the piston, I get:

## P = \frac{F}{S} + \frac{F}{S} + ... + \frac{F}{S} = \frac{N*F}{S} ##

which contradicts conservation of energy and also because it just seems wrong because I was told the pressure on the piston is just : ## P = \frac{F}{S} ## and not ## P = \frac{N*F}{S} ##

Why is there contradiction of conservation of energy and why the pressure on the piston is not ## P = \frac{N*F}{S} ##?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-6-11_22-58-51.png
    upload_2018-6-11_22-58-51.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 511
  • upload_2018-6-11_22-58-55.png
    upload_2018-6-11_22-58-55.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 486
  • upload_2018-6-11_22-59-58.png
    upload_2018-6-11_22-59-58.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 499
  • upload_2018-6-11_23-15-46.png
    upload_2018-6-11_23-15-46.png
    1.9 KB · Views: 898
Physics news on Phys.org
Pressure is an intensive quantity, not an extensive one. You sum forces, not pressures.
 
Orodruin said:
You sum forces, not pressures.
Well, you can sum pressures if they all act on the same patch of surface, but then we would have pressure NF/S acting on area S/N for a total force of F and an average pressure over S of F/S.
 
Orodruin said:
Pressure is an intensive quantity, not an extensive one. You sum forces, not pressures.

So if for example, I have a trapezoid block of mass and two pistons are acting on either side of it, each exerting force F1 and F2 upon the faces L1 and L2 respectively, as shown in the figure below:

upload_2018-6-12_10-18-11.png


Then, I think the total pressure on the trapezoid should be:
## P = \frac{F_1}{L_1} + \frac{F_2}{L_2} ##
But according to what you said, pressure is an intensive property so summation like this cannot be done.

So my question is: what should be the total pressure acting on the trapezoid?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-6-12_10-13-52.png
    upload_2018-6-12_10-13-52.png
    400 bytes · Views: 489
  • upload_2018-6-12_10-18-11.png
    upload_2018-6-12_10-18-11.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 444
You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of what pressure means. It is not the property of an object as a whole, it is a local property that describes force per unit area over an intersection. In your trapezoid example, the pistons need to apply the same pressure for the system to be in equilibrium - the hydrostatic pressure of the liquid. Otherwise you cannot apply hydrostatics, which is also what let's you assume that the pressure is constant throughout the liquid.
 
Orodruin said:
a fundamental misunderstanding of what pressure means
And maybe one regarding compression and tension.
Compression is not a force, exactly, but more a pair of equal and opposite forces. Even just looking at the forces rather than pressure, the compression is not F1+F2. Assuming equilibrium, the compression is F1=F2.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top