Pressure / Vacuum Analysis During Submersion

AI Thread Summary
During submersion testing of a product, pressure measurements indicate a rise to 5 psi at 120C and a drop to -10 psi when submerged, conflicting with ideal gas law predictions. The calculations suggest a pressure of around -2 psi upon submersion, but actual measurements show swings of 12.5 psi, indicating a significant volume change of approximately 41.8%. The assumption of constant volume during the test is challenged, suggesting other factors may be influencing results. The discussion raises the possibility of humidity affecting the pressure readings. Further analysis and sharing of calculations are encouraged to identify the underlying issues.
navier1863
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a product that we perform submersion testing on to determine susceptibility to water intrusion. The product is heated to 120C and then placed in an ice bath. I have measured the pressure / vacuum during testing and have determined that the pressure can rise to 5 psi while heating and drop to -10 psi while submerged.

The ideal gas law aligns with the 5 psi while at 120C but when dunked, the calculations state that the pressure should be around -2 psi. I am trying to determine how to calculate this result. Any advice?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Double check your numbers. I get close to your measured value with ideal gas assumption.

If you want to show your math, we maybe can find the problem.
 
During testing of the product, I am seeing pressure swings of 12.5 psi. Initially I assumed that volume remained the same (which is not correct but I will get to that). The following are calculations:
- P1 * V1 = n R T1
- Final Pressure = (Delta T) * Initial Pressure

If I use the test data that indicates the pressure can change by 12.5 psi, the volume would need to change by approximately 41.8%. There is something else occurring that I am not accounting for. Any thoughts? Is there anything related to humidity that might be affecting this test?
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top