Pressure vessel leakage - time to equalize

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for a pressurized dry nitrogen vessel to equalize with atmospheric pressure given a known leakage rate. Key considerations include the complexities of compressible flow and the effects of temperature changes due to gas expansion. A reference to Milton Beychok's website is suggested for further insights on the topic. The problem is acknowledged as challenging due to the dynamics involved in gas behavior under pressure. Understanding these factors is essential for accurate time estimation in pressure equalization scenarios.
Dwarf
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I have a problem I hope someone could help. I have a pressurized dry Nitrogen vessel. Given a known leakage rate, how long will it take for the internal pressure to be equal to atmospheric pressure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take a look at Milton Beychok's website for a good reference on this. It's a tricky problem when considering compressible, choked flow with a varying temperature due to expansion.

http://www.air-dispersion.com/feature2.html
 
Thanks, Fred. That help.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top