Pressure, Volume & Temperature: Investigating the Relationship

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between pressure, volume, and temperature in an ideal gas, emphasizing that increasing pressure in a fixed volume requires an increase in temperature or the number of gas molecules. The Amontons pressure-temperature law is mentioned, highlighting that pressure is directly proportional to temperature when volume is constant. Participants clarify that temperature does not increase to "cancel" pressure but rather that pressure is determined by temperature and the number of gas molecules. The Joule-Kelvin effect is referenced, illustrating how rapid gas expansion can lead to temperature decrease, relevant in refrigeration. Overall, the conversation reinforces the interdependence of these state variables in gas behavior.
fonz
Messages
151
Reaction score
5
If the product of pressure and volume over temperature is equal to some constant for a particular ideal gas.

Let's say the volume is just a vessel and the pressure in the vessel is increased. So effectively the volume remains the same. Any increase in pressure must be canceled by an increase in temperature of the gas within the vessel is this correct? So by pressurising gas you are increasing the temperature?

Fundamentally is the relation between pressure and temperature this simple?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, P \alpha T and it's called Amontons pressure-temperature law.
 
Hi,
and the converse is interesting, the rapid expansion of a gas causes the temperature to decrease. This is used in refrigeration and and freezing sprays. A way of making carbon dioxide in schools often involves the rapid expansion of a CO2 fire extinguisher into a suitable chamber.
Look up the Joule-Kelvin effect.
Dave
 
fonz said:
If the product of pressure and volume over temperature is equal to some constant for a particular ideal gas.

Let's say the volume is just a vessel and the pressure in the vessel is increased. So effectively the volume remains the same. Any increase in pressure must be canceled by an increase in temperature of the gas within the vessel is this correct? So by pressurising gas you are increasing the temperature?
How are you increasing the pressure? You're keeping the volume the same, and if you pump more gas in then PV/T will increase. It's not that temperature increases to 'cancel' the increase in pressure; it's that you will have to raise the temperature to make the pressure go up.
 
I got to thinking,
It is true that pressure and volume over temp is a constant.
PV=NkT
I like the fact that this equation of state tells us the relationship between the state variables, pressure, volume and temperature. All of which are measurable quantities, (for an ideal gas).
So if we rearrange and think of what determines the pressure of your system.
P=(NkT)/V
So the only three ways to increase the pressure are to (V) decrease the volume, (T) increase the temperature and (N) increase the number of molecules. In your fixed vessel you have kept the volume constant, so you could only increase the pressure by either increasing the temperature or increase the number of molecules into the vessel. I agree with haruspex the temperature does not increase to cancel the pressure, it’s more like once you set the volume and the temperature for a fixed mass of gas the pressure is uniquely determined. Changing anyone of these variables will mean at least one of the other state variables must change to. Check out PVT surfaces, there ace.
Dave
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top