Pressure wave through liquid in pipe

AI Thread Summary
A pressure wave traveling through a liquid in a pipe changes shape as it moves from a constant cross-section to a cone of increasing area. The wavefront at point A is planar, but at point B, it is expected to have a slight spherical curvature due to the pipe's geometry. There is no simple formula for determining the wavefront shape; instead, modeling the wave propagation using a wave equation is recommended for accurate results. Numerical analysis software like COMSOL can effectively simulate this scenario. Understanding these dynamics requires a more complex approach than straightforward calculations.
g_mogni
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm a bit rusty with my fluid mechanics and can't seem to find the answer anywhere. Basically I have a pressure wave traveling in a liquid at the speed of sound through a pipe of the shape shown in the attachment (basically a semicircle of constant cross sectional area and then a cone of increasing area. At point A I know the wave has planar wavefront. Is there any formula to work out the shape of the wavefront at the end of the cone at point B, which I suppose will have a slight spherical curvature due to the changing cross-sectional size of the pipe?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • wave.png
    wave.png
    9.7 KB · Views: 463
Physics news on Phys.org
There isn't really "a formula" that you can use to determine this by just plugging some numbers in. You could solve the system pretty accurately by modeling it with a wave equation and letting the wave propagate through your geometry to see how it ends up. That's quite a bit more involved than just using a formula to spit out an answer, though.
 
Do you happen to know if a software like COMSOL or other similar programs can perform such analysis numerically?

Thanks
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top