Principle of Least Action - not always valid?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Master J
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Least action Principle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Principle of Least Action, as discussed in Landau & Lifgarbagez Mechanics, is not universally valid for the entire path of a system in phase space but holds true for sufficiently small segments. The derivation of Lagrange's Equation relies on this principle, yet it is crucial to recognize that the extremal of the action can represent a minimum, saddle point, or maximum, rather than strictly a minimum. This distinction is vital for understanding the behavior of geodesics, such as great circles on a sphere, where the shortest path between points may vary. Relevant examples and conditions for deriving differential equations from variational principles are provided in the linked resources.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrange's Equation
  • Familiarity with geodesics in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of variational principles in physics
  • Basic concepts of phase space in mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lagrange's Equation in detail
  • Explore the implications of geodesics in Riemannian geometry
  • Investigate variational principles and their applications in physics
  • Review the provided resources on differential equations and variational principles
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students of mechanics seeking a deeper understanding of the Principle of Least Action and its implications in variational calculus and differential geometry.

Master J
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
It is stated in Landau & Lifgarbagez Mechanics that the Principle of Least Action is not always valid for the entire path of a system in phase space, but only for a sufficiently small segment of the path.

Can anyone expand on this?

How can we be sure that when we derive Lagrange's Equation that the principle is valid?

I guess the statement has slightly confused me - what are the consequences of this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically, the equation gives a geodesic in some space. On a sphere, the great circles are geodesic. But between two points, you can go either direction on the geodesic, the short way or the long way. But between any two nearby points on the geodesic, it is always the short way. So some other quantity needs to be examined to figure out whether the extremal of the action we get is a minimum, saddle point, or maximum. The equation is almost always right, just the name "least action" isn't. Some specific examples are given by:
http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/chap6.pdf
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/Gray&TaylorAJP.pdf

The conditions under which differential equations can be derived from a variational principle are discussed by http://www.dic.univ.trieste.it/perspage/tonti/
http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.3177
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K