What is the Principle of Least Action?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating the principle of least action using the Lagrangian for a mass in a gravitational field. Participants explore methods to show that the action is minimized for the true motion of the particle, with one suggesting the use of perturbations to the equation of motion. Another participant proposes using calculus of variations to find the function that minimizes the action, although they note a lack of prior instruction in that area. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proving that the action of perturbed motion exceeds that of the true motion. Overall, the thread highlights different approaches to understanding and applying the principle of least action in physics.
HalfManHalfAmazing
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The Lagrangian of a mass in a uniform gravitational field can be written as follows: L = \frac{1}{2}m\dot{y}^2 + mgy

Consider all differentiale functions y(t) such that y(t1) = y1 and y(t2) = y2 where y1 and y2 are fixed values. Show that the action is a minimum for the function defining the true motion.


Homework Equations



I believe this simply an 'example' of prooving the principle of least action.

The Attempt at a Solution



I am wondering where to start. I derived the equation of true motion of the particle. Should I know plus in the given Lagrangian to the action integral and then then add a pertubation to the equation of true motion and then plug THAT into the action and show that the action of the perturbed equation of motion must be greater then the action of the original?

Thanks guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your idea is one way of doing it.

Another way would be to find the function that minimizes the action using calculus of variations, and see that it is the same as the true motion which you derived indepedently.
 
We have not been taught calculus of variations yet, though I may look into that. Thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top