Principle of relativity, covariance and physical law.

center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
Hi! I'm studying special relativity and relativistic dynamics and I'm struggeling a little bit with the concept of 'covariance' of physical equations.

As far as I understand so far 'covariance' is related to the 'form invariance' of the equations of motions in relativity and the concept is important because of the principle of relativity, i.e. that all physical laws are the same in every reference frame.

Maybe a good example here is the rate of change of momentum in an electromagnetic field;
one observer might say that the circular motion of an electron is due to a pure magnetic field, while another observer with a relative velocity experiences it as being due to a mixture of magnetic and electric fields.

Is this then an example of something which is in contradiction to the principle of relativity and thus not a physical law, per definition?

Is the reason that we introduce the field tensor and write
m \frac{d^2 x^\mu}{d \tau^2} = F^{\mu \nu} \frac{d x^\nu}{d \tau}
that this equation is covariant in the sense that ALL observers will agree that the proper acceleration of the space time position is due to the field tensor, so that THIS then is an example of a physical law?

I would really appreciate comments on my current understanding and start a discussion around this to get it straight.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The main motivation for talking about relativistically covariant objects is to be able to talk about them in a different coordinate system from the one you started out with.

In other words, while one can work with E and B and not F, when one transforms into a new coordinate system, to find E' you need to know both E and B, for example. F is regarded as a complete, covariant object because transforming from F to F' only requires information about the components of F (and the nature of the transformation).

The equation you gave is covariant in the sense that different observers will measure the components of the proper acceleration, EM field tensor, and the velocity (you should've had current here) and get the same answer when the equation is assembled.

In a broader sense, covariant objects obey certain transformation laws--not arbitrary ones, but ones based in the geometry of spacetime, like rotations (boosts), translations, stretches, and dilations.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top