Probability - continuous random variables

Kate2010
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Ok, I have 2 questions:

1. Nicotine levels in smokers can be modeled by a normal random variable with mean 315 and variance 1312. What is the probability, if 20 smokers are tested, that at most one has a nicotine level higher than 500?

2. fX,Y (x,y) = xe-x-y 0<x<y<\infty
Find c.
Find the marginal probability density functions.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



1. I have worked out that each smoker individually has a 0.079 probability of having a nicotine level higher than 500, but I'm not sure about the at most one section. Would I need to work out 1-P(at least 2 have a nicotine level higher than 500) where P(at least 2 have a nicotine level higher than 500) = P(2 have a nicotine level higher than 500) + P(3 do) + P(4 do) + ... + P(20 do). In this case would it be a geometric sum with a = 0.0792, r = 0.079 and n = 19?

2. It is the limits of integration that I am finding confusing here. I know to find c I need to do the double integral equal to one, but is it \int^{infinity}_{0}\int^{y}_{0} fX,Y (x,y) dx dy (i.e. integrating x between 0 and y and y between 0 and infinity)?

Similarly for the marginal distributions would the limits when integrating with respect to y be 0 and infinity and x be 0 and y?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kate2010 said:

Homework Statement



Ok, I have 2 questions:

1. Nicotine levels in smokers can be modeled by a normal random variable with mean 315 and variance 1312. What is the probability, if 20 smokers are tested, that at most one has a nicotine level higher than 500?

2. fX,Y (x,y) = xe-x-y 0<x<y<\infty
Find c.
Find the marginal probability density functions.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



1. I have worked out that each smoker individually has a 0.079 probability of having a nicotine level higher than 500, but I'm not sure about the at most one section. Would I need to work out 1-P(at least 2 have a nicotine level higher than 500) where P(at least 2 have a nicotine level higher than 500) = P(2 have a nicotine level higher than 500) + P(3 do) + P(4 do) + ... + P(20 do). In this case would it be a geometric sum with a = 0.0792, r = 0.079 and n = 19?

P(at most 2) = P(0) + P(1). And if your p = .079 is correct and X is the number with nicotine over 500, then isn't X binomial(20,p)?

2. It is the limits of integration that I am finding confusing here. I know to find c I need to do the double integral equal to one, but is it \int^{infinity}_{0}\int^{y}_{0} fX,Y (x,y) dx dy (i.e. integrating x between 0 and y and y between 0 and infinity)?

Similarly for the marginal distributions would the limits when integrating with respect to y be 0 and infinity and x be 0 and y?

Your limits are correct. Click on the expression below to see how to render it in tex:

\int_0^\infty \int_0^y f(x,y)dxdy
 
Kate2010 said:
the limits when integrating with respect to y be 0 and infinity and x be 0 and y?


I didn't notice this final question. For the marginals your limits are determined by the non-zero region. So when integrating in the x direction you will go from 0 to y and when integrating in the y direction, it will go from x to infinity. Your nonzero domain is in the first quadrant above the line y = x.
 
Thanks a lot, really helpful :)
 
Ah ok, so fX(x) = \int_x^\infty f(x,y) dxdy not fX(x) = \int_0^\infty f(x,y) dxdy?
 
Kate2010 said:
Ah ok, so fX(x) = \int_x^\infty f(x,y) dxdy not fX(x) = \int_0^\infty f(x,y) dxdy?
Probably just a typo, but you shouldn't have dx in the integrals because you're only integrating over y. And yes, the limits on your first integral is what LCKurtz meant.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top