Probability Density Function of |X|^(1/2)+|Y|^(1/2)+|Z|^(1/2) with N(0,1)

forumfann
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Could anyone help me figure out the the probability density function (pdf) of |X|^(1/2)+|Y|^(1/2)+|Z|^(1/2) if X, Y and Z are distributed normally with mean 0 and variance 1, N(0,1) ?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are your variables independent? If so, first work out the distribution of |X|^{1/2}. The other distributions will be identical and you can use standard procedures to find the distribution of their sum.
 
Yes, the variables are independent. But what are the standard procedures? It there a easier way to get the pdf if one has more random variables than three?
 
Last edited:
If X, Y, and Z, are distributed normally, just make them a normal (gausian) PDF of a random variable.

X=Ae^(ax). You're lucky that you can use little x,y, and z for your random variables to match up with their distributions.
 
"X=Ae^(ax). " That isn't the form of a normal distribution.

Okay, suppose X \sim n(0,1). Think this way.

1) You should be able to write down the distribution of |X| - it's a pretty
standard result, and if you're working on this problem I'm guessing you know this.
2) Use a standard transformation (if W = |X|, find the distribution of square root of W). This gives the distribution of |X|^{1/2}.<br /> 3) Since X, Y and Z are i.i.d, the same is true for <br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; |X|^{1/2} + |Y|^{1/2} + |Z|^{1/2}&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> so the distribution of their sum should be relatively easy to obtain.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top