Probability for an exponential random distribution

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the probability P(|Y - μ| < 1.4σ) for an exponential random variable characterized by the parameter β. Participants are exploring the implications of this probability statement in the context of the exponential distribution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about the question's intent, particularly regarding the role of the parameter β and the setup of the integral. Others suggest defining the integration limits based on the inequality |Y - μ| < 1.4σ and computing the mean and variance in terms of β.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing various approaches to set up the integral and are questioning the assumptions related to the limits of integration. There is a recognition of the need to substitute expressions for μ and σ in terms of β, and some guidance has been provided regarding the integration process.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted technicality regarding the limits of integration, specifically that the exponential density function applies only for non-negative values of y, which influences the setup of the problem. Participants are considering the implications of this constraint on their calculations.

RET80
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the exact value of P(|Y- μ| < 1.4σ) for an exponential random variable with parameter β.


Homework Equations


The only equation that I can think of is the exponential distribution equation:
∫(1/β)e^(-y/β)


The Attempt at a Solution


I have been unable to attempt it because I don't know what exactly this question is attempting to ask. It wants to solve for Parameter β, but it has a probability of P(|Y- μ| < 1.4σ)

Could I set my integral up from 1.4σ to infinity? and have my y variable equal to 'Y - μ' in my integral? I don't know what that would solve, if anything.

I'm not looking for an answer, just an idea of what to look for when attempting these equations, or better yet, what I'm missing or not understanding.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have also noticed that it is in the structure of a Tchebysheff's inequality, which may or may not change something...

I attempted to do the integral of it. I took the integral from 0 to 1.4σ and β = Y - μ and ended up getting -1 + e ^(1.4σ / (Y - μ))

I have no idea if this is the correct way to get to this answer, but it is what I attempted to do.
 
| Y - \mu | &lt; 1.4 \sigma implies
\mu-1.4\sigma &lt; Y &lt; \mu+1.4\sigma
so that defines the interval for the integration.

Look up (or compute) the formula for \mu and \sigma in terms of the parameter \beta. Substitute these expressions , either before or after you do the integral. The only "unknown" in the problem will then be \beta. If this problem has a numerical answer then all the \beta's will cancel.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
| Y - \mu | &lt; 1.4 \sigma implies
\mu-1.4\sigma &lt; Y &lt; \mu+1.4\sigma
so that defines the interval for the integration.

Look up (or compute) the formula for \mu and \sigma in terms of the parameter \beta. Substitute these expressions , either before or after you do the integral. The only "unknown" in the problem will then be \beta. If this problem has a numerical answer then all the \beta's will cancel.

Well I did the integral from μ - 1.4σ to μ + 1.4σ using the above mentioned equation and I got:
[ -e^(-(μ + 1.4σ)/β) + e^ (-(μ - 1.4σ)/β)]

And it's looking for the exact answer of this.
Well the other equations I know are the equations for the mean and variance
given by:
Mean: μ = E(Y) = β
Variance: σ^2 = V(Y) = β^2

I don't know exactly what to do from here. I could do some substitution for the mean, but I don't know what that would do.
 
RET80 said:
I don't know exactly what to do from here. I could do some substitution for the mean, but I don't know what that would do.

You can substitute for \sigma too.(\sigma^2 = \beta^2 and because both are positive, we can conclude \sigma = \beta. All the \beta&#039;s will be gone when you reduce the fractions.

There is an important technicality about this problem. The formula for the exponential density only applies for those y that are non-negative. So when I said that the limit of integration was \mu - 1.46 \sigma to [\mu + 1.46 \sigma, I was wrong. That lower limit would only be correct if

\mu - 1.46 \sigma \geq 0.

i.e. \beta - 1.46 \beta \geq 0 which is false.

The lower limit of integration should be 0 in this case.

If the problem asks about a smaller multiple of \sigma such as "find the probability that | Y - \mu | &lt; 0.5 \sigma you could do it the way I originally suggested.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
5K