Probability of a team wining a best of 3 game

  • Thread starter Thread starter roflmao33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Game Probability
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a probability problem involving a best-of-3 tournament series between two teams, A and B. Team A has a 60% chance of winning any individual game. Participants explore the probability of team A winning the tournament and the implications of different series lengths on this probability.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the different pathways through which team A can win the tournament and question the calculations related to the probabilities of these outcomes. There is also exploration of why the overall probability of winning the tournament exceeds 60%.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and hints to clarify the reasoning behind the probability calculations. Some participants are attempting to reconcile their understanding of the problem with the outcomes they are calculating.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of the tournament structure and the independence of game outcomes. There is a focus on understanding the correct interpretation of winning conditions in a best-of-3 series.

roflmao33
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two teams, teams A and B, are competing in a tournament. Suppose the tournament is a ‘best-of-3’ series; in other words, the first team to win 2 games wins the tournament. Let’s suppose that team A has a slight edge on team B, such that the probability that team A wins any given game is 60%, and the outcome of any previous match does not influence team A’s probability of winning in any future match.
a. What is the probability that team A wins this tournament?
b. Explain why the probability that team A wins the tournament is greater than 60%.
c. If this had been a ‘best-of-7’ series (first team to win 4 games), would the probability that team A wins the tournament be greater or less than what you calculated in a)?
d. Calculate the probability team A wins a ‘best-of-7’ series.


The Attempt at a Solution



There should be 3 ways that team A can win the tournament (3 choose 2=3). Since the probability of team A winning a game is 0.6. The probability of team A winning the tournament will be 3C2*(0.6)^2*(0.4)=0.432?

What am I doing wrong. I can't get a probability of greater than 60% as of question (b).

Thx in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
roflmao33 said:

Homework Statement


Two teams, teams A and B, are competing in a tournament. Suppose the tournament is a ‘best-of-3’ series; in other words, the first team to win 2 games wins the tournament. Let’s suppose that team A has a slight edge on team B, such that the probability that team A wins any given game is 60%, and the outcome of any previous match does not influence team A’s probability of winning in any future match.
a. What is the probability that team A wins this tournament?
b. Explain why the probability that team A wins the tournament is greater than 60%.
c. If this had been a ‘best-of-7’ series (first team to win 4 games), would the probability that team A wins the tournament be greater or less than what you calculated in a)?
d. Calculate the probability team A wins a ‘best-of-7’ series.


The Attempt at a Solution



There should be 3 ways that team A can win the tournament (3 choose 2=3). Since the probability of team A winning a game is 0.6. The probability of team A winning the tournament will be 3C2*(0.6)^2*(0.4)=0.432?

What am I doing wrong. I can't get a probability of greater than 60% as of question (b).

Thx in advance.

They don't have to win just two games. They could also win all three games.
 
Dick said:
They don't have to win just two games. They could also win all three games.

Okay. So they still play the last game even though team A won the first 2? That will give me (0.6)^3 +0.432=0.648.Am i right?
 
No, if it's a best-of-three, then they can't win three games. I'm getting the same result as you just got, but I don't think you went about it the proper way in your last post. You were on the right track when you said at the beginning that there are three possible pathways to team A winning, though. Can you explain what those three paths are? If you can, then maybe you will see where you have gone wrong in your original calculations.

Hint: Those three pathways don't all have the same probability of occurring.
 
roflmao33 said:
Okay. So they still play the last game even though team A won the first 2? That will give me (0.6)^3 +0.432=0.648.Am i right?

Sure, you calculated the probability they win EXACTLY two games. So add the probability they win 3. It doesn't really matter if they stop the tournament when team A has won 2. If they do and you want to count the actual cases, then A could win the first two, or lose the first or second and win the third. If you add that up, you'll get the same number.
 
thx Dick..
 
In the best two of three scenario, A wins the tournament if the game winners are: AA*, ABA and BAA.

In the best of 7, look at what happens if: (1) A wins the first game; or (2) B wins the first game. In case (1) we are left with up to 6 games in the tournament, and A must win 3 (equivalently, B cannot win 4). In case (2) we are essentially swapping A and B.

RGV
 
Ryker said:
No, if it's a best-of-three, then they can't win three games. I'm getting the same result as you just got, but I don't think you went about it the proper way in your last post. You were on the right track when you said at the beginning that there are three possible pathways to team A winning, though. Can you explain what those three paths are? If you can, then maybe you will see where you have gone wrong in your original calculations.

Hint: Those three pathways don't all have the same probability of occurring.

If you think about it you'll realize that it doesn't really matter if they play out the tournament or not. How can it? The cases just get more complicated if you start trying to figure in the possibility of skipping games.
 
Thx for the help guys.. right now I am trying to figure out part (b).Why is it bigger than 60%? Any hints?
 
  • #10
roflmao33 said:
Thx for the help guys.. right now I am trying to figure out part (b).Why is it bigger than 60%? Any hints?

If you have a 60% probability of winning in any individual game, can you explain in words why if you play more games that your probability of winning over 1/2 of the games gets better and better as the number of games increases? If you play N games, how many do you expect to win, on average?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K