Probability of being dealt one pair from a 52-card deck

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pair Probability
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Since no one wants to answer my heat conductor problem (*hint hint*), here's a more interesting one.

If it is assumed that all (52 choose 5) poker hands are equally likely, what is the probability of being deal one pair? (This occurs when the cards have denominations a, a, b, c, d, where a, b, c, and d are all distinct.)

Homework Equations



Basic rules of probability

The Attempt at a Solution



First, let me harken back to an example in the book and then employ the same reasoning.

For instance, suppose 5 people are to be randomly selected from a group of 20 individuals consisting of 10 married couples, and we want to determine the probability that the 5 chosen are unrelated.

The book then goes on to say that we can think of this as a

six-stage experiment: In the first stage, 5 of the 10 couples to have a member in the group are chosen; in the next 5 stages, 1 of the 2 members of each of these couples is selected.

This gives the result (10 choose 5)*25 / (20 choose 5).

Now, it seems like I can use an analogous 5-stage experiment.

Stage 1:

We'll have 4 different denominations represented. The number of ways to choose these is (13 choose 4).

Stage 2:

Then, from 1 of the chosen denominations, we'll have (4 choose 2) different suits to complete our pair.

Stages 3-5:

Then we'll choose 4 different suits from each of the remaining 3 denominations, which allows for 43 possibilities.

Since the total number of ways to be dealt 5 cards from a deck of 52 is (52 choose 5), the probability of getting a single pair is therefore

(13 choose 4) * (4 choose 2) * 43 / (52 choose 5).

However, this isn't the answer in the back of the book. :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown:

Explain my fallacious reasoning.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jamin2112 said:

Homework Statement



Since no one wants to answer my heat conductor problem (*hint hint*), here's a more interesting one.

If it is assumed that all (52 choose 5) poker hands are equally likely, what is the probability of being deal one pair? (This occurs when the cards have denominations a, a, b, c, d, where a, b, c, and d are all distinct.)

Homework Equations



Basic rules of probability

The Attempt at a Solution



First, let me harken back to an example in the book and then employ the same reasoning.



The book then goes on to say that we can think of this as a



This gives the result (10 choose 5)*25 / (20 choose 5).

Now, it seems like I can use an analogous 5-stage experiment.

Stage 1:

We'll have 4 different denominations represented. The number of ways to choose these is (13 choose 4).

Stage 2:

Then, from 1 of the chosen denominations, we'll have (4 choose 2) different suits to complete our pair.

Stages 3-5:

Then we'll choose 4 different suits from each of the remaining 3 denominations, which allows for 43 possibilities.

Since the total number of ways to be dealt 5 cards from a deck of 52 is (52 choose 5), the probability of getting a single pair is therefore

(13 choose 4) * (4 choose 2) * 43 / (52 choose 5).

However, this isn't the answer in the back of the book. :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown: :frown:

Explain my fallacious reasoning.

It would have been helpful to tell us what the book's answer was. However, I think your reasoning by analogy starts off incorrectly. You seem to break up the cards into 4 groups of 13, but I think the way the book's reasoning went, they would have broken the cards into 13 groups of 4, then ask whether they get two from the same group and 3 from three other distinct groups.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
It would have been helpful to tell us what the book's answer was. However, I think your reasoning by analogy starts off incorrectly. You seem to break up the cards into 4 groups of 13, but I think the way the book's reasoning went, they would have broken the cards into 13 groups of 4, then ask whether they get two from the same group and 3 from three other distinct groups.

RGV

The book's answer is [13*(4 choose 2)*12*(4 choose 1)*11*(4 choose 1)*10*(4 choose 1) / 3!] / (52 choose 5)
 
Your count for the number of hands is
$$\binom{13}{4} \binom{4}{2} 4^3 = \frac{13 \times 12 \times 11 \times 10}{4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1}\binom{4}{2}4^3$$ while the book's is
$$\binom{13}{1} \binom{4}{2} \binom{12}{3}4^3 = \frac{13}{1}\times \frac{12 \times 11 \times 10}{3 \times 2 \times 1} \binom{4}{2} 4^3$$ The only difference between your answer and the book's answer is a factor of 4. Can you see why the factor of 4 needs to be there?
 
vela said:
Can you see why the factor of 4 needs to be there?


Because after choosing 4 denominations from 13, I then had 4 choices to which I could assign the pair. Correct?
 
Right.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top