Probability of Finding a Particle in a Small Interval in an Infinite Square Well

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the probability of finding a particle in a small interval within an infinite square well, specifically at x = 3L/4. The key equation used is ψ(x) = √(2/L) sin(nπx/L), and the probability density is derived from integrating ψ²(x) over the specified interval. Participants clarify that for small intervals, direct evaluation of the wave function is sufficient, as the sine function does not vary significantly. The final probability for the interval Δx = 0.006L at x = 3L/4 is confirmed to be 0.006, highlighting the importance of understanding the wave function's behavior in this context. Overall, the exercise emphasizes the nuances of probability calculations in quantum mechanics.
Vitani11
Messages
275
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A particle is in the n=1 state in an infinite square well of size L. What is the probability of finding the particle in the interval Δx = .006L at the point x = 3L/4?

Homework Equations


ψ(x) =√(2/L) sin(nπx/L)

The Attempt at a Solution


The problem states that because Δx is very small I don't need to do any integration. I've been integrating anyway because it's fun in this particular case- but my problem is what to do with x = 3L/4. I've integrated up to x= 0.006L in ψ2(x) and I'm getting the correct answer for if the particle was at x=L/2. What do I do here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You show your work and then we can comment :smile:. 'up to x = 0.006 L' makes me feel uneasy: up to x = 0.006 L from where ?
 
So here is the integration from 0 to 0.006L. I tried the integration from 0.006L to 3L/4 also and I am getting a number greater than 1...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_17111.jpg
    IMG_17111.jpg
    24.4 KB · Views: 439
Holy **** the answer was simply 0.006. can you please explain this to me?
 
Disaster ! But the original exercise asks about probability to find the bugger in an interval of width 0.006 L at 3/L/4 , so I would be reassured if you integrated from 0.75 L to 0.7506 : or so. Since the sine varies only little in uch a small interval, you can just take the value. But, if I may ask: what do you integrate (what's the integrand) ? (edit: never mind, iI can see you do it right from the grey-on grey picture). Now about the value.
 
I figured that since at L/2 there would be the highest probability at that point. At 3L/4 you're a little bit further right in the well and since the probability of finding a particle represents a sine wave then it would have to be a number smaller than what I got integrating from 0 to 0.006L (which was twice 0.006L) but how are you to know that it's at exactly 0.006L?
 
Doesn't sound good to me, but I can be wrong...
[edit] no, sounds good to me. Why ?
 
The integrand is √(2/L) sin2 (nπx/L)
 
Vitani11 said:
So here is the integration from 0 to 0.006L. I tried the integration from 0.006L to 3L/4 also and I am getting a number greater than 1...
You missed a factor 1/2: ##\quad{\bf 2} \sin^2x = 1-\cos 2x##

[edit] and the numerics look mistaken too: for small x , ##\ x-1/2 \sin2x ## should be closer to 0.
 
  • #10
Vitani11 said:
The integrand is √(2/L) sin2 (nπx/L)
so at 3L/4 that sine squared is 1/2, and ## {2\over L } {1\over 2 } 0.006 L = 0.006 ##

Simple exercise, lots to learn !. (not only you, me 2)
 
  • Like
Likes Vitani11
  • #11
I see. Thank you.
 
Back
Top