Probability of getting specific states -- Quantum Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the probabilities of an electron being in specific quantum states given a 4x4 Hamiltonian with defined eigenkets. It is highlighted that without knowing the expansion coefficients or the specific state of the electron, one cannot ascertain the probabilities for the states ψ1up, ψ1down, ψ2up, and ψ2down. The eigenvectors provided are merely representations of the Hamiltonian's eigenstates, and the electron's actual state could be any linear combination of these vectors. The lack of information about the electron's state prevents any probability calculations. Thus, without additional data, the probabilities remain indeterminate.
Thomas Brady
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm pretty new to quantum, so I'm pretty sure I'm missing something basic here. I've got a 4x4 Hamiltonian with eigenkets $$\psi_{U} = 1/(\sqrt 2) (\psi_{1up} \pm \psi_{2up})$$ and $$\psi_{D} = 1/(\sqrt 2) (\psi_{1down} \pm \psi_{2down})$$ The only difference between the two states is the spin as signified by the subscripts up (U) and down (D). The plus states have the eigenvalue ##E_0 - t## and the minus states have the eigenvalue ##E_0 + t##. Knowing this, how can I say what the probability is of an electron being in any of the ##\psi_{1up}##, ##\psi_{1down}##, ##\psi_{2up}##, and ##\psi_{2down}## states, without knowing the probability it is in ##\psi_{U}## or ##\psi_{D}##?

Just to be clear there are of course 4 eigenkets, but the difference between each of the plus and minus eigenkets is the spin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thomas Brady said:
Knowing this, how can I say what the probability is of an electron being in any of the ψ1up\psi_{1up}, ψ1down\psi_{1down}, ψ2up\psi_{2up}, and ψ2down\psi_{2down} states, without knowing the probability it is in ψU\psi_{U} or ψD\psi_{D}?
The basis sets ##\psi_u^+,\psi_u^-,\psi_d^+,\psi_u^-## and ##\psi_{1\textrm {up}},\psi_{1\textrm {down}},\psi_{2\textrm {up}},\psi_{2\textrm {down}}## are connected by some transformation matrix. Thus, a given state of an electron can be equivalently expressed in either set. If you don't know the expansion coefficients, which represents the probability being found in the corresponding basis, in one of the sets, you cannot determine the coefficients in the other set.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
The basis sets ##\psi_u^+,\psi_u^-,\psi_d^+,\psi_u^-## and ##\psi_{1\textrm {up}},\psi_{1\textrm {down}},\psi_{2\textrm {up}},\psi_{2\textrm {down}}## are connected by some transformation matrix. Thus, a given state of an electron can be equivalently expressed in either set. If you don't know the expansion coefficients, which represents the probability being found in the corresponding basis, in one of the sets, you cannot determine the coefficients in the other set.

So, essentially I cannot determine the probabilities, with the given information
 
Thomas Brady said:
with the given information
The given information? You mean the equations you posted there? Those vectors you gave there are merely the eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian. An electron can have arbitrary wavefunction which is some linear combination of those 4 vectors. In order to know the probabilities you have to know the state the electron is in.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
The given information? You mean the equations you posted there? Those vectors you gave there are merely the eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian. An electron can have arbitrary wavefunction which is some linear combination of those 4 vectors. In order to know the probabilities you have to know the state the electron is in.

Right, and with the problem I was given it does not appear to specify which state it is in.
 
Thomas Brady said:
Right, and with the problem I was given it does not appear to specify which state it is in.
Yes, it doesn't give you the information about the state.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top