Probability of getting specific states -- Quantum Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the probabilities of an electron being in specific quantum states given a 4x4 Hamiltonian with defined eigenkets. It is highlighted that without knowing the expansion coefficients or the specific state of the electron, one cannot ascertain the probabilities for the states ψ1up, ψ1down, ψ2up, and ψ2down. The eigenvectors provided are merely representations of the Hamiltonian's eigenstates, and the electron's actual state could be any linear combination of these vectors. The lack of information about the electron's state prevents any probability calculations. Thus, without additional data, the probabilities remain indeterminate.
Thomas Brady
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm pretty new to quantum, so I'm pretty sure I'm missing something basic here. I've got a 4x4 Hamiltonian with eigenkets $$\psi_{U} = 1/(\sqrt 2) (\psi_{1up} \pm \psi_{2up})$$ and $$\psi_{D} = 1/(\sqrt 2) (\psi_{1down} \pm \psi_{2down})$$ The only difference between the two states is the spin as signified by the subscripts up (U) and down (D). The plus states have the eigenvalue ##E_0 - t## and the minus states have the eigenvalue ##E_0 + t##. Knowing this, how can I say what the probability is of an electron being in any of the ##\psi_{1up}##, ##\psi_{1down}##, ##\psi_{2up}##, and ##\psi_{2down}## states, without knowing the probability it is in ##\psi_{U}## or ##\psi_{D}##?

Just to be clear there are of course 4 eigenkets, but the difference between each of the plus and minus eigenkets is the spin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thomas Brady said:
Knowing this, how can I say what the probability is of an electron being in any of the ψ1up\psi_{1up}, ψ1down\psi_{1down}, ψ2up\psi_{2up}, and ψ2down\psi_{2down} states, without knowing the probability it is in ψU\psi_{U} or ψD\psi_{D}?
The basis sets ##\psi_u^+,\psi_u^-,\psi_d^+,\psi_u^-## and ##\psi_{1\textrm {up}},\psi_{1\textrm {down}},\psi_{2\textrm {up}},\psi_{2\textrm {down}}## are connected by some transformation matrix. Thus, a given state of an electron can be equivalently expressed in either set. If you don't know the expansion coefficients, which represents the probability being found in the corresponding basis, in one of the sets, you cannot determine the coefficients in the other set.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
The basis sets ##\psi_u^+,\psi_u^-,\psi_d^+,\psi_u^-## and ##\psi_{1\textrm {up}},\psi_{1\textrm {down}},\psi_{2\textrm {up}},\psi_{2\textrm {down}}## are connected by some transformation matrix. Thus, a given state of an electron can be equivalently expressed in either set. If you don't know the expansion coefficients, which represents the probability being found in the corresponding basis, in one of the sets, you cannot determine the coefficients in the other set.

So, essentially I cannot determine the probabilities, with the given information
 
Thomas Brady said:
with the given information
The given information? You mean the equations you posted there? Those vectors you gave there are merely the eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian. An electron can have arbitrary wavefunction which is some linear combination of those 4 vectors. In order to know the probabilities you have to know the state the electron is in.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
The given information? You mean the equations you posted there? Those vectors you gave there are merely the eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian. An electron can have arbitrary wavefunction which is some linear combination of those 4 vectors. In order to know the probabilities you have to know the state the electron is in.

Right, and with the problem I was given it does not appear to specify which state it is in.
 
Thomas Brady said:
Right, and with the problem I was given it does not appear to specify which state it is in.
Yes, it doesn't give you the information about the state.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top