MHB Probability of Not Getting Candy

  • Thread starter Thread starter alfred2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
The probability of a nephew not receiving any candy when c candies are distributed randomly among n kids is calculated as (1 - 1/n)^c. A participant suggests that the correct formula should be (n-1/n)^c, but this is equivalent to the original expression. When n equals c, the probability approaches (1 - 1/n)^n, which approximates e^-1 as n becomes large. This means that as the number of kids and candies increases, the probability stabilizes around 0.37. The discussion clarifies the mathematical reasoning behind the probability calculation and its limit.
alfred2
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi I've found this exercise but I do not understand the solution:
_________________________________________________________________
In a party c candies are given randomly to n kids. ¿Which is the probablility that my nephew doesn't receive any candy? We supose the candies and the kids are numerated. Each of the candies can be given to any of the n kids, so there are n^c possible cases and the unfavorable ones for my nephew are all the manners to distribute the candies between the (n-1) remaining kids i.e. (n-1)^c. So the probability is (1-1/n)^c. If n=c the probability is practically independent of n, being aproximately equals to e^-1=0.37
_________________________________________________________________
First of all I think there's a mistake and the probability is (n-1/n)^c and not (1-1/n)^c. Then what's the meaning of "If n=c the probability is practically independent of n"? What does independent mean in this case? And how do we obtain e^-1? Thanks! If anyone know a book as "probability and statistics for dummies" please let me know! Thanks ;)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
alfred said:
Hi I've found this exercise but I do not understand the solution:
_________________________________________________________________
In a party c candies are given randomly to n kids. ¿Which is the probablility that my nephew doesn't receive any candy? We supose the candies and the kids are numerated. Each of the candies can be given to any of the n kids, so there are n^c possible cases and the unfavorable ones for my nephew are all the manners to distribute the candies between the (n-1) remaining kids i.e. (n-1)^c. So the probability is (1-1/n)^c. If n=c the probability is practically independent of n, being aproximately equals to e^-1=0.37
_________________________________________________________________
First of all I think there's a mistake and the probability is (n-1/n)^c and not (1-1/n)^c. Then what's the meaning of "If n=c the probability is practically independent of n"? What does independent mean in this case? And how do we obtain e^-1? Thanks! If anyone know a book as "probability and statistics for dummies" please let me know! Thanks ;)

Welcome to MHB, alfred! :)You seem to have left out a couple of parentheses.
The probability is $$\frac {(n-1)^c}{n^c} = \left(\frac {n-1}{n}\right)^c = \left(1 - \frac {1}{n}\right)^c$$.If n=c, the probability becomes $$\left(1 - \frac {1}{n}\right)^n$$.
If n is large enough this will approximate its limit for $n \to \infty$.Since $$\frac 1 e=\lim_{n \to \infty} \left(1-\frac 1 n\right)^n$$ (see for instance wiki), the probability approximates $e^{-1}$.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top