MHB Probability of Not Getting Candy

  • Thread starter Thread starter alfred2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
alfred2
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi I've found this exercise but I do not understand the solution:
_________________________________________________________________
In a party c candies are given randomly to n kids. ¿Which is the probablility that my nephew doesn't receive any candy? We supose the candies and the kids are numerated. Each of the candies can be given to any of the n kids, so there are n^c possible cases and the unfavorable ones for my nephew are all the manners to distribute the candies between the (n-1) remaining kids i.e. (n-1)^c. So the probability is (1-1/n)^c. If n=c the probability is practically independent of n, being aproximately equals to e^-1=0.37
_________________________________________________________________
First of all I think there's a mistake and the probability is (n-1/n)^c and not (1-1/n)^c. Then what's the meaning of "If n=c the probability is practically independent of n"? What does independent mean in this case? And how do we obtain e^-1? Thanks! If anyone know a book as "probability and statistics for dummies" please let me know! Thanks ;)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
alfred said:
Hi I've found this exercise but I do not understand the solution:
_________________________________________________________________
In a party c candies are given randomly to n kids. ¿Which is the probablility that my nephew doesn't receive any candy? We supose the candies and the kids are numerated. Each of the candies can be given to any of the n kids, so there are n^c possible cases and the unfavorable ones for my nephew are all the manners to distribute the candies between the (n-1) remaining kids i.e. (n-1)^c. So the probability is (1-1/n)^c. If n=c the probability is practically independent of n, being aproximately equals to e^-1=0.37
_________________________________________________________________
First of all I think there's a mistake and the probability is (n-1/n)^c and not (1-1/n)^c. Then what's the meaning of "If n=c the probability is practically independent of n"? What does independent mean in this case? And how do we obtain e^-1? Thanks! If anyone know a book as "probability and statistics for dummies" please let me know! Thanks ;)

Welcome to MHB, alfred! :)You seem to have left out a couple of parentheses.
The probability is $$\frac {(n-1)^c}{n^c} = \left(\frac {n-1}{n}\right)^c = \left(1 - \frac {1}{n}\right)^c$$.If n=c, the probability becomes $$\left(1 - \frac {1}{n}\right)^n$$.
If n is large enough this will approximate its limit for $n \to \infty$.Since $$\frac 1 e=\lim_{n \to \infty} \left(1-\frac 1 n\right)^n$$ (see for instance wiki), the probability approximates $e^{-1}$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top