Probability of Spin in Y-up direction

Raynor49
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a) If a spin-1/2 particle is in the up spin state along z, what is the probability that if its spin along the y-direction is measured it will be found to be pointing in the “up” direction along y?

(b) Calculate the expectation values of the components of S, i.e. {Sx, Sy, Sz}, for a spin-1/2 particle in the state χ+z , i.e. spin-up along z

(c) Ditto in the state χ-z, i.e. spin-down along z.

Homework Equations


1) ψ ( θ) = cos(θ/2)ZUP + sin(θ/2)ZDOWN.
2) YUP = (ZUP + iZDOWN)/√2
3) YDOWN = (ZUP − iZDOWN)/√2

The Attempt at a Solution


For a), can you rewrite equations 2 and 3 like ZUP = (YUP + iYDOWN)/√2 & ZDOWN = (YUP − iYDOWN)/√2 to plug into equation 1? Since I know from equation 1 the probabilities of zup or zdown are (cos(θ/2))^2 & (sin(θ/2))^2 respectively, if you subbed in the y values for zup and zdown, could you then simplify and square the coefficients of yup and ydown to get their probabilities?

Any help is appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach is correct, but I don't see what you're going to do with equation 1. Can't you simplify the problem further?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top