Probability theory: a regenerative process

dirk_mec1
Messages
755
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/4844/14820448wb9.png


The Attempt at a Solution


First of all I'm trying to find the expected time of a cycle. In a cycle two things can happen:

1) the car lives long enough to reach A with probability 1-F(A)
2) the car fails to reach age A with probability F(A)

Knowing this how can you compute the liftime of a cycle? I thought of something like:

E(T) =A*(1-F(A)) + F(A) * ? (I don't know what to fill in the question mark)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
E(T) is the expected value of T ~ F conditional on T < A. But you can directly solve for the expected resale price:

Let event 1 be {the car fails before A}. If event 1 occurs then resale value = 0 (do you see this?)
Let event 2 be {the car lives to A} (that is, it lives to see A, and possibly more). If event 2 occurs then resale value = R(A).

Suppose the probability of event 1 was G. Convince yourself that the prob. of event 2 must be 1 - G.

Then E(resale value) = G * 0 + (1-G) * R(A).

What you should think about is how to find G.
 
EnumaElish said:
E(T) is the expected value of T ~ F conditional on T < A.
So the expected life of a cycle is: E[T|T&lt;A] = \int_0^{A} x f(x)\ \mbox{d}x

But you can directly solve for the expected resale price:

Let event 1 be {the car fails before A}. If event 1 occurs then resale value = 0 (do you see this?).
Yes It's stated in the exercise.

Let event 2 be {the car lives to A} (that is, it lives to see A, and possibly more). If event 2 occurs then resale value = R(A).

Suppose the probability of event 1 was G. Convince yourself that the prob. of event 2 must be 1 - G.
That's clear.

Then E(resale value) = G * 0 + (1-G) * R(A).

What you should think about is how to find G.

I presume that G must be F(A). But the question asks for the costs so how do I incorporate that in the resale value given that there are two different outcomes?
 
Once you figure the expected resale value, you can use it to figure the expected net cost, defined as cash expenses - expected resale value.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top