Problem about conservation of energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem involving the conservation of energy, specifically determining if a ball thrown upwards with an initial kinetic energy of 5.4 J will reach a height of 3.04 m. The approach involves using the conservation of energy formula, where the initial kinetic energy plus potential energy equals the final kinetic energy plus potential energy. By calculating the potential energy at the apex and adding it to the initial height of 2.15 m, the participants find that the ball reaches a height slightly above 3.04 m. This confirms that the ball does indeed reach the specified height. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly setting reference points in energy calculations.
physstudent1
Messages
267
Reaction score
1
I have a problem about conservation of energy I did it but I'm not sure if it is correct...

"From 2.15m a ball is thrown upwards with KE of 5.4 J it's mass is .6 kg will it go 3.04 m high? use the law of conservation of energy"

What I did was set KEinitial + PEinitial = KEfinal + PEfinal

eventually ending up with v = .2357 m/s now coming to that I thought that maybe that means it will reach the height because It still has speed at the designated height but then I realized its not velocity and if it was going down it would still have a positive speed...can anyone check this out for me how do I know if it will reach that height I dont' really get it...I used the designated 3.04 for the PEfinal calculation..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For this problem, a diagram would be best. Point a would be ball at 2.15m (at rest). Make this your reference leve. And then there is point b, some point higher than point a, assuming its the apex. KEa + PEa = KEb + PEb. Now, there is no potential energy at the reference level so there is only KEa left on that side. You already said that was equal to 5.4 J. On the other side, for point b, there is no kinetic energy because the ball has reached its apex. The velocity would be zero, so you would only have PEb left. That equals mgh. The mass is .6 and g is 9.81.

So you have 54J = .6X9.81h. Solve for h. That says how high the ball went. Add that number to your 2.15m. Is it greater than 3.04m?
 
wow thanks

Wow I never thought to start the refernce line at 2.15 that's a great idea thank you very much I ended up getting 3.06 for the total height after adding it to 2.15 which means it does reach the 3.04m I think that's right? thank you very much!:cool:
 
Yeah, I got 3.07, along the same answer as you, so yes, it did reach 3.04m. Glad I could help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top