Problem about tensile stress during thermal contraction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating tensile stress in wires made of steel and copper during thermal contraction. The user presents their calculations, noting that at 40°C, there is no tension, but tension increases as the wires cool. They derive equations based on Young's Modulus and thermal coefficients to determine the stretching and changes in length of both wires. The user finds their calculated tension to be approximately 119.093 N, while the expected answer is 125 N, prompting them to seek feedback on potential calculation errors. The conversation highlights the importance of precise calculations in material science and thermal dynamics.
issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Hi

I am trying to solve this problem. I will present my solution though I couldn't get the tension right.

At 40 Celsius , there is no tension in the wire. When the wires are cooled , they contract and the tension increases. But the tensile stress, which is force per unit area, will remain the same for both the wires, even if they are different in constitution.
I am neglecting the increase in radius, hence the area of the wires, because its negligible.

When the tensions develop , let the steel wire be stretched by amount \Delta x_s
from its reduced length Ls. Similarly, let copper wire be stretched by amount
\Delta x_c from its reduced length Lc. Let L = 2 m be the original length of each wire. Since

\mbox{Young's Modulus}\, =\frac{\mbox{Tensile Stress}}{\mbox{Tensile Strain}}

we have

\frac{F}{A}= Y_s \,\frac{\Delta x_s}{L_s} = Y_c \,\frac{\Delta x_c}{L_c}

where Ys and Yc are Young's Moduli for the steel and copper.
They are

Y_s=20 \times 10^{10} N/m^2

Y_c= 11 \times 10^{10} N/m^2

so from above equation, we get , rearranging


\Delta x_s = \left(\frac{Y_c}{Y_s}\right)\left(\frac{L_s}{L_c}\right) \Delta x_c

Since amount of stretching must be equal to the thermal contraction, we have

\Delta x_s + \Delta x_c= \Delta L_s + \Delta L_c

where \Delta L_s \cdots \Delta L_c are change in the length of the steel and copper rods due to cooling. Also note that

L_s = L\left[1-\alpha_s (\Delta T) \right]

L_c= L\left[1-\alpha_c(\Delta T) \right]

where \alpha_s \cdots \alpha_c are Linear thermal coefficients of the steel and the copper respectively.

So, we have two equations in variables, \Delta x_s and \Delta x_c

we can solve for one of them now.


\Delta x_c=\left[1+\frac{Y_c}{Y_s}\frac{(1-\alpha_s \Delta T)}{(1-\alpha_c \Delta T)} \right]^{-1} L (\alpha_s +\alpha_c) \Delta T

The values for \alpha_s \cdots \alpha_c are

\alpha_s = 11 \times 10^{-6} (^{\circ}C)^{-1}
\alpha_c=17 \times 10^{-6} (^{\circ}C)^{-1}

solving we get, for various quantities described above,

\Delta x_c= 7.2555 \times 10^{-4} m

\Delta L_c=\alpha_c L(\Delta T) =(17 \times 10^{-6})(2)(20)=6.8 \times 10^{-4} m

\Delta L_s=\alpha_s L(\Delta T) =(11 \times 10^{-6})(2)(20)=4.4 \times 10^{-4} m

\Delta x_s =\Delta L_s + \Delta L_c -\Delta x_c

\Delta x_s = 3.97 \times 10^{-4} m

and the junction shifts by the distance of , say k,

k= \Delta L_s - \Delta x_s=\Delta x_c - \Delta L_c = 0.43 \times 10^{-4} m

Now the tension , F is given by

F= Y_s(A)\frac{\Delta x_s}{L(1-\alpha_s \Delta T)} = 119.093 \, N

I got the value of k right, but the book's answer for F is 125 N. Is there anything wrong with
the calculations ?

I had taken the value of \Delta T = 20^{\circ}\, C, as positive.
 

Attachments

  • 1.PNG
    1.PNG
    37.2 KB · Views: 575
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
any inputs ... anybody ?
 
hi IssacNewton! :smile:
IssacNewton said:
Y_s=20 \times 10^{10} N/m^2

\Delta x_s = 3.97 \times 10^{-4} m

Now the tension , F is given by

F= Y_s(A)\frac{\Delta x_s}{L(1-\alpha_s \Delta T)} = 119.093 \, N

I got the value of k right, but the book's answer for F is 125 N. Is there anything wrong with
the calculations ?

I had taken the value of \Delta T = 20^{\circ}\, C, as positive.

i do get about 125 N :confused:
 
Oh no...:cry:

math mistakes...:-p
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top