Problem: flux through prism faces

  • Thread starter Thread starter PSantiago
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux Prism
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the flux of a wind vector field through the lateral faces of a triangular prism, numerical methods using tools like Matlab or Octave can be employed. The flux through the top face can be determined by applying the divergence theorem, which states that the total flux through a closed surface is equal to the volume integral of the divergence of the vector field. Given that the flux through the bottom face is null, the flux through the top face will equal the total lateral flux. The challenge lies in approximating the vector field, which is only defined at specific points, necessitating interpolation or numerical integration techniques. This approach allows for the calculation of the desired flux despite the lack of a continuous function for the vector field.
PSantiago
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I need help regarding a practical problem I'm facing. It's not a homework/coursework, It's a real-life problem.

I have the values of a vector field (wind) given in six coordinates in 3D space. Those coordinates are the vertices of a triangular right prism (looks similar to my problem: http://i.imgur.com/2TU7D.png).

I would like to find the flux of this vector field through each lateral face of the prism. The components of the vector field may be approximated by linear functions.

My goal is to find the flux through the top face, given that the flux through the bottom face is null.

I'm trying to solve this numerically, i.e., using tools such as Matlab/Octave.

How could I do this?

Any suggestion (a reference for a method, a similar example, etc.) is welcome.

Sorry if this isn't the best place to post this kind of question, but since it's about flux I thought it would be included in General Physics section.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
My goal is to find the flux through the top face, given that the flux through the bottom face is null.

I'm wondering how that can be anything but zero as well? Given the top and bottom faces are parallel and the flux is wind.

Is the wind moving in a curved path? Sounds like the maths would be horrible.
 
In fact, it's an application of divergence theorem; sorry for not mentioning this. That's why Petyab is right in suggest Gaussian surfaces.

I'm assuming that the volume integral of 3D wind divergence is null. Thus, the flux through the closed surface bounding the volume must be null. I know that the flux through bottom face is zero. Therefore, the flux through the top face must equals the total lateral flux.

Despite the relevance of those assumptions, my point is how to numerically find the fluxes considering I don't have a function for my vector field. Moreover, I have the vector field given only in specific points in space.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top