Problem involving angular momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a problem involving the calculation of angular speed after a perfectly inelastic collision between a snowball and a sign. The user initially calculates the angular speed before impact as 2.35 rad/s and attempts to use conservation of linear momentum, leading to an angular speed of 0.9625 rad/s after impact. However, it is pointed out that linear momentum is not conserved due to external forces at the pivot, and the correct approach is to use conservation of angular momentum about the pivot. This correction leads to a different angular speed of 0.498 rad/s. The user acknowledges the oversight regarding the conservation principles.
issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Hi

I have posted the problem in files 1 and 2. Its the same problem split in two files. The problem asks to find the angular speed immediately after impact. The problem is from the chapter
of angular momentum but I am trying to solve it using conservation of linear momentum.
In part a, I calculated the angular speed immediately before the impact. Its
\omega_i=2.35 \,\mbox{rad/s}. Now when the snowball hits the sign, we have a perfectly inelastic collision. So for calculating the speed immediately after the impact, we need to calculate the center of mass of the sign+snowball system.

r_{cm}=\frac{(0.4)(0.5)+(2.4)(0.25)}{0.4+2.4}=0.2857\, \mbox{m}

So we set up the following equation for the conservation of momentum.

-m_{snow}v_{snow}+m_{sign}v_i \omega_i=(m_{snow}+m_{sign})r_{cm}\omega_f

where v_i is the velocity of the center of mass of the sign just before the impact. Since vi is the product of the distance of the center of mass from the axis of rotation and the initial angular velocity, we have

v_i=(0.25)(2.35)

so we get, after plugging in the numbers,

-(0.4)(1.6)+(2.4)(0.25)(2.35)=(0.4+2.4)(0.2857)\omega_f

\omega_f=0.9625\, \mbox{rad/s}

But using the methods of angular momentum conservation, I get

\omega_f=0.498\, \mbox{rad/s}So where am I going wrong ?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • 1.PNG
    1.PNG
    24.4 KB · Views: 500
  • 2.PNG
    2.PNG
    26.7 KB · Views: 473
Physics news on Phys.org
IssacNewton said:
So where am I going wrong ?
Linear momentum is not conserved. The center of mass is not free to translate because of the external forces at the pivot. You need to conserve angular momentum about the pivot.
 
Kuruman, thanks. I just overlook that fact.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top