Problem : Metrics and Induced Topologies

  • Thread starter Thread starter AKG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induced
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the metrics dp, defined for each p in the natural numbers, induce the same topology as the Euclidean metric. The approach involves showing that for any ε > 0 and x in ℝ^n, there exist δ1 and δ2 such that the inequalities relating the Euclidean metric and dp hold true. Participants are considering whether to use induction on n or p, or if a non-inductive method is feasible. The need to confirm that each dp is indeed a metric is also highlighted, as this is essential to establishing the topology equivalence. Visual aids, like diagrams of n-spheres, are suggested as helpful tools in understanding the relationship between these metrics.
AKG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
2,559
Reaction score
4
The Euclidean metric, d, is defined by:

d(x, y) = \left [\sum _{i = 1} ^n |x_i - y_i|^2\right ]^{1/2}

Define metrics dp for each p in {1, 2, 3, ...} as follows:

d_p(x,y) = \left [\sum _{i = 1} ^n |x_i - y_i|^p\right ]^{1/p}

Prove that each dp induces the same topology as the Euclidean metric.

To do this, I want to show that for every \epsilon > 0 and for every x \in \mathbb{R}^n, there is are \delta _1,\, \delta _2 > 0 such that for every y \in \mathbb{R}^n:

\left [\sum _{i = 1} ^n |x_i - y_i|^2\right ]^{1/2} < \delta _1 \Rightarrow \left [\sum _{i = 1} ^n |x_i - y_i|^p\right ]^{1/p} < \epsilon

and

\left [\sum _{i = 1} ^n |x_i - y_i|^p\right ]^{1/p} < \delta _2 \Rightarrow \left [\sum _{i = 1} ^n |x_i - y_i|^2\right ]^{1/2} < \epsilon

Is this the right way to prove it? Where do I go from here? Induction on n, or p? Or maybe both? Or is there a way to do it without induction? Help would be very much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, the problem I really have to solve is to show that, assuming each dp is a metric, they all induce the usual topology on Rn, and I figured the best way to do this was to show that they induced the same topology as the Euclidean metric since these "metrics" (they might not all be metrics, but the problem says to assume they are) look a lot like the Euclidean metric.
 
Well, when you don't understand something, draw a picture. :smile:

A circle (or an n-sphere, in general) is a characteristic of the Euclidean metric, right? What about these other metrics?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top