Problem on calculating decay rates/lifetimes

  • Thread starter Thread starter AuraCrystal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay
AuraCrystal
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given the Lagrangian

\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2} ( \partial_{\mu} \Phi)^2-\frac{1}{2}M^2 \Phi ^2 + \frac{1}{2} ( \partial_{\mu} \phi)^2-\frac{1}{2}M^2 \phi ^2-\mu \Phi \phi \phi,

[The last term, the interaction term allows a \Phi particle to decay into 2 \phi particles, assuming of course that M>2m.] Calculate the decay rate of that process to lowest order in \mu

Homework Equations



Dyson expansion, etc.

The Attempt at a Solution


OK, so I'm stuck on computing the transition amplitude here. Following Aitchison and Hey, the transition amplitude is (letting the initial momentum be pi and the final momenta be p1 and p2):

<f|S|i>=<p_1, p_2|S|p_i>

To the lowest order in \mu, the S-matrix is

S=-i\mu \int d^4 x \mathcal{H}_{interaction}=-i\mu \int d^4 x \Phi \phi \phi

so to lowest order, the transition amplitude is

<p_1, p_2|S|p_i>=-i\mu<0|a_{\phi}(p_1) a_{\phi}(p_2) \sqrt(2E_1) \sqrt(2E_2) \int d^4 x \Phi \phi \phi \sqrt(2E_i) a_{\Phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) |0>
Considering just the last bit, namely
\phi \phi \sqrt(2E_i) a_{\Phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) |0>
We can expand the \phi in terms of creation and annihilation operators, right? For the annihilation operator, it'll commute with the a_{\Phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) so that term will give 0. For the other\phi, we get the same thing. So you're going to get something like

\int a_{\phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) a_{\phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) a_{\Phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) |0>

Can't you just commute a_{\Phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) to the left? When bracketed with the final state which has no \Phi particles, this'll give 0. Did I make a mistake? Or do I just have to consider a higher order term in the Dyson expansion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AuraCrystal said:
Can't you just commute a_{\Phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) to the left? When bracketed with the final state which has no \Phi particles, this'll give 0. Did I make a mistake? Or do I just have to consider a higher order term in the Dyson expansion?

When moving a_{\Phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) to the left, wouldn't you need to consider what happens when moving it past \Phi?
 
^Yeah, I forgot about that! Thanks! :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top