Problem on photoelectric effect

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum kinetic energy of a photoelectron liberated from lithium by electromagnetic radiation. The provided electric field equation is analyzed using trigonometric identities to identify the maximum frequency component. The maximum kinetic energy is derived using the photoelectric equation, incorporating the work function of lithium, which is 2.3 eV. The calculations suggest that the maximum kinetic energy is approximately 0.5 eV, aligning with option d). The conclusion is that the approach and result appear correct if the work function value is accurate.
issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Hello

Here is the problem I am trying to solve.
Find the maximum kinetic energy of the photo electron liberated from the surface of lithium
by electromagnetic radiation whose electric component varies with time as

E=a(1+\cos \omega t)\;\cos(\omega_0 t)

where a is constant and \omega = 6 \times 10^{14} \; s^{-1} and
\omega_0 = 3.6 \times 10^{15} \; s^{-1}

options for the answers are given as

a)0 eV
b)2 eV
c) 0.38 eV
d) 0.5 eV

Now since maximum kinetic energy will depend upon the maximum frequency present in the
E. So I was trying to turn the equation for E in the following way using trig identities.

E=a\left[\cos \omega_0 t + \frac{1}{2}\cos(\omega_0 - \omega)t+\frac{1}{2}\cos(\omega_0 + \omega)t \right]

And now I can see that the max frequency component present is \omega_0 + \omega
But \omega_0 + \omega = 2\pi(f_0 +f). Now using the photoelectric equation and
noting that the work function for lithium (wikipedia) is 2.3 eV, we have

K_{\mathrm{max}} = h\;(f_0 +f) - \phi

Now since \phi is given in eV, we can use value of h in eV-sec, so we get

K_{\mathrm{max}} = (4.14\times 10^{-15})\left[\frac{6\times 10^{14} + 3.6\times 10^{15}}{2\pi}\right]-2.3

and rounding numbers , I get approximately 0.5 eV, which is option d). Does it look ok ?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it looks OK if the work function is correct. .

ehild
 
thanks ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top