Problem understanding the differential form of the circulation law

havarija
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've encountered a problem in learning about the curl of a vector field.
(My learning material is the "Div, Grad, Curl and all that" from H.M. Shey.)


Introduction to problem:

The curl of a field F is defined as:
∇×F = i (∂Fz/∂y - ∂Fy/∂z) + j(∂Fx/∂z - ∂Fx/∂x) + k(∂Fy/∂x - ∂Fx/∂y)

He claims the following:
If we take:
n.(∇xF) for n = i, j, k
and they all equal 0 that we can conclude that ∇xF = 0 generally.

Is it not that we can only conclude that:
∂Fz/∂y = ∂Fy/∂z
∂Fx/∂z = ∂Fx/∂x and
∂Fy/∂x = ∂Fx/∂y

Or does this conclusion imply the following somehow?

Thanks .)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi havarija! welcome to pf! :smile:

∂Fz/∂y = ∂Fy/∂z
∂Fx/∂z = ∂Fx/∂x and
∂Fy/∂x = ∂Fx/∂y

is the same as ∇xF = 0 :wink:

(and, for any vector V, if n.V = 0 for n = i, j, k then V must be 0 !)
 


Now it seems like a ridiculous question :D

Silly me. But now at least I joined the forum :)
 
Welcome! I love ridiculous questions- I can actually answer some of them!
 
havarija said:
The curl of a field F is defined as:
∇×F = i (∂Fz/∂y - ∂Fy/∂z) + j(∂Fx/∂z - ∂Fx/∂x) + k(∂Fy/∂x - ∂Fx/∂y)

if youre reviewing it may be helpful to consider the following definition of curl component:

curlF\cdot u=\lim_{A(C)\to0}\frac{1}{A(C)} \oint_C F\cdot dr where C is a closed loop, A(C) is the area of the loop, vector field F and unit vector u. this is the definition of the u-component of curl.
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...
Back
Top