How do I determine the wavenumber of a Rossby wave with longitudinal width?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kirovman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Waves
AI Thread Summary
To determine the wavenumber of a Rossby wave with longitudinal width, the speed of the wave is given by the formula c = &\overline{u} - \frac{\beta}{k^2 + l^2}. The user has calculated beta and is focusing on the longitudinal wavenumber k, believing that the latitudinal wavenumber l can be discarded. They attempted to use the formula k = \frac{n \pi}{L} but found their results to be 2-5 times larger than expected. The user seeks clarification on their calculations, particularly regarding the expected wave speed of -0.75 m/s compared to their computed 3.37 m/s. Accurate determination of k and understanding the influence of meteorological factors on wave behavior are crucial for resolving this issue.
kirovman
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was wondering how to find the wavenumber of a Rossby wave?

The information I have so far is speed of the wave is c = &\overline{u} - \frac{\beta}{k^2 + l^2}}

where l and k are longitudinal/latitudinal wavenumbers, beta is df/dy and u is basic westward flow. I have determined the value of beta already.

What I want to know is, how can I determine the Rossby wavenumbers if I have a wave with longitudinal width. I believe I can discard one of the wavenumbers since the wave only propagates longitudinally.
But I am stuck trying to determine it. I think it is something like k = \frac{n \pi}{L} but it does not give me exactly the right answer. - it is about 2 - 5 times bigger than required for various questions.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
kirovman said:
Hi, I was wondering how to find the wavenumber of a Rossby wave?

The information I have so far is speed of the wave is c = &\overline{u} - \frac{\beta}{k^2 + l^2}}

where l and k are longitudinal/latitudinal wavenumbers, beta is df/dy and u is basic westward flow. I have determined the value of beta already.

What I want to know is, how can I determine the Rossby wavenumbers if I have a wave with longitudinal width. I believe I can discard one of the wavenumbers since the wave only propagates longitudinally.
But I am stuck trying to determine it. I think it is something like k = \frac{n \pi}{L} but it does not give me exactly the right answer. - it is about 2 - 5 times bigger than required for various questions.

As I understand it, the wave number varies due to meteorological causes. As your second formula states, there has always to be an integral number of waves circling the earth, but that number can change, and when it does, the velocity changes. Normally the waves advance, but for some wave numbers they can halt or even reverse.
 
So for a wave at latitude 45 degrees, with 5 maxima around a circle of longitude, and latitudinal width 5000km, superimposed on u= 5 m/s, I have tried to determine the speed of the wave relative to the ground.

I used n= 5 (for 5 maxima), and L = 5000km. My value for beta is 1.6 x 10^-11.
This give me value for k = pi x 10^-6 and I set the other wavenumber (l) to zero.

This gives me 3.37 m/s, but apparently I am supposed to get -0.75 m/s.
Any advice? This is one of the few points driving me crazy before my next exam. Thanks.
 
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...
These last days, there is a seemingly endless cluster of rather powerful earthquakes close to the islands of Santorini, Amorgos, Anafi, and Ios. Remember, this is a highly volcanically active region, Santorini especially being famous for the supervolcanic eruption which is conjectured to have led to the decline of the Minoan civilization: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minoan_eruption To grasp the scale of what is happening, between the 26th of January and the 9th of February, 12000...
Back
Top