Project that is similar to the coupled pendulum

AI Thread Summary
The project involves creating a system similar to a coupled pendulum but using springs, which presents challenges in finding relevant background theory. The discussion highlights that without an angle, the spring system is less interesting and resembles a simple coupled oscillator. Suggestions include exploring Lagrangian or Hamiltonian dynamics for equations of motion, although resources are scarce. Additionally, there is a request for help in finding practice problems in theoretical mechanics, particularly for someone in Vietnam. Recommendations include "Schaum's Outline of Lagrangian Dynamics" for its solved examples and practice problems.
Jonny
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am doing a project that is similar to the coupled pendulum (http://www.her.itesm.mx/academia/profesional/cursos/fisica_2000/FisicaII/PHYSENGL/cpendula.htm but with springs instead of pendulum. My problem is that I am required to give background theory and the address of sites I got it from, but I don't know any and all the search engines I have tried seem to have no results. My teacher has never seen anyone do this project this way before and said if worse comes to worse I must roughly use the info on coupled pendulum. But as that goes into the angle of the pendulum (which springs don't have) it doesn't help much. Can you please help as soon as possible (as it is due in soon). Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
But as that goes into the angle of the pendulum (which springs don't have)
If the spring does not have an angle to it then the system is not very interesting. Two masses that jiggle up and down with a spring between them is just a coupled oscillator.
http://lectureonline.cl.msu.edu/~mmp/applist/coupled/osc2.htm

On the other hand if there is a angle for the spring the system is more interesting and harder to find information on.

Near the end of the web page there is a problem similar to yours:
http://webpages.ursinus.edu/lriley/courses/p212/lectures/node5.html

If you do have time you can look up Lagrangian or Hamiltonian dynamics and find the equation of motion.

I did a search on the web for other resources and did not come up with much so if you do not have time for Lagrangian or Hamiltonian dynamics you may be out of luck.
 
Help!
I don't want to create another topic,just for a little need of help.So i decide to post my trouble in this topic.Plz forgive me if you mind.

I have recently done on Theoretical Mechanics.And i find it very hard to solve the problems in this subject (may be it too strange).

So i have to practise more on this subject.And the problem 's i can find any book that contain problems.I have some books but they're too hard for me.
I'm from Vietnam,it's hard too find a good book in our country.I can only find it on Internet.Can anyone help me?
Problems,Exercises on Theoretical Mechanics.

Thanks in advance
 
"Schaum's Outline of Lagrangian Dynamics" Schaum's Outlines always have many solved example problems and should provide considerable practice for you. This is the first book that comes to mind. I have not used this particular book but have used other Schaum Outline's and was happy with them.

Hope this helps.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top