Sign Convention for Projectile Motion on an Inclined Plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simon Hall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Incline Projectile
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the sign convention for projectile motion on an inclined plane, particularly when launching a projectile down the incline. The original poster questions whether they can choose the x-direction to increase from left to right or right to left, noting that their calculations yield correct results only when they maintain a consistent sign convention. Responses clarify that while it's acceptable to choose any direction for x, gravity typically acts in the vertical direction (y-axis), which must be accounted for. The poster acknowledges their mistake in changing the sign convention without adjusting the corresponding landing angle formula. Consistency in sign convention is crucial for accurate calculations in projectile motion.
Simon Hall
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a quick question about projectiles on an inclined plane. Specifically, when the projectile is launched down an inclined plane. Is it not possible to use your choice of sign convention? If the projectile is moving from left to right like so:

V
...V
.....V
....__ V__

Could I not choose the x-direction as increasing from left to right just as easily as increasing from right to left?

In the first instance, increasing left to right, the initial velocity and acceleration due to gravity in the x-direction would both be positive, and in the second instance they would both be negative.

The trouble is: it only seems to work (I only get the "right" answer) when it's the former, Ux and Ax are +. Why is this the case, does anybody know?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It works whichever direction you choose for x. Write down your calculations and we can help you point out where it goes wrong.
 
Hello Simon, :welcome:

Please post in the homework forum and use the template. Usually x is from left to right; no problem if you are consistent. But gravity often is only in the vertical direction, which we are used to call y !
 
Hi, thanks for the responses. I had thought so. I now realize that I was changing the sign convention without (correspondingly) altering the landing angle formula! Thanks.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top