Projectile Mechanics: 3-D List for Researching

AI Thread Summary
A projectile's trajectory can be defined in 2D by projecting its 3D motion onto a 2D plane. While it is possible to resolve the trajectory into its components, this method can become complex. The discussion highlights the need for resources or lists that detail the 3-D mechanics of projectiles. Understanding these mechanics is essential for accurate research and analysis. Comprehensive resources on this topic would greatly benefit those studying projectile motion.
michaelknight
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Does anybody know where I could find a list of 3-D mechanics of a projectile? I would greatly appreciate it :). Thank you very much in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
michaelknight said:
Does anybody know where I could find a list of 3-D mechanics of a projectile? I would greatly appreciate it :). Thank you very much in advance :)

A projectile's trajectory can always be defined in 2D.
 
The simplest way to do so is to project the 3D motion on a 2D plane. You can also resolve it into its components, but that can get a little tricky.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

Projectile Intercept Math & Trigonometry
Replies
4
Views
2K
Exhaustive Projectile Analysis
Replies
6
Views
1K
B The physics of flywheel launchers (like tennis ball shooters)
2
Replies
60
Views
4K
Proportionality theorem and projectile motion
Replies
8
Views
1K
Path of a projectile with a non-constant gravity
Replies
5
Views
2K
Solving projectile motion problems using Lagrangian mechanics
Replies
9
Views
1K
Projectile Motion: Path's length?
Replies
18
Views
3K
Why do heavier projectiles tend to have higher momentum?
Replies
29
Views
5K
Sign Convention for Projectile Motion on an Inclined Plane
Replies
3
Views
2K
Working on a simple(ish) projectile motion problem for a gaming program
Replies
8
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top