Projectile Motion Lab: Calculating Projectile Trajectory with a Slingshot

AI Thread Summary
The experiment involved launching a clay ball with a slingshot to calculate projectile motion parameters, including flight time, maximum height, and initial velocities. The results indicated discrepancies, with the calculated maximum height of 1.08m being significantly higher than the observed height of approximately 0.5m. Possible sources of error include air resistance, which affects the ball's trajectory and maximum height, and the initial angle of launch, which can influence the time the ball is airborne. The teacher noted that a lower launch angle could minimize error by reducing the duration of air resistance impact. Overall, the calculations likely need reevaluation to account for these factors.
Byrgg
Messages
335
Reaction score
0
We did an experiment, where we used a slingshot to launch a clay ball and then we had to calculate various things, like the time of the trip, the max height, etc., knowing the horizontal displacement, as well as the angle at which the ball was fired(and the vertical displacement, but that's pretty much just common sense, seeing as the ball was about level with the ground).

First off, I don't think my answers were accurate, sure, in a human experiment, there's always going to be at least a little bit of error, but my final answer seems way off. Here's the data gathered:

average horizontal displacement: 1.69m
angle at which the ball was fired: tan(theta) = y/x = 22/14 = 58 degrees
vertical displacement: 0m

The first thing I calculated was the initial vertical velocity, and I got 5.77m/s, then, using the angle at which the projectile was fired along with this, I got the initial velocity, 6.80m/s [58 degrees above the horizontal].

Following this, I calculated the the initial horizontal velocity, and got 3.60m/s.

I then got the flight time, which was 0.47s.

Finally, I got the max height, 1.08m. This doesn't seem right at all, and the time is probably off by a fair bit. The calculations obtained a result of over 1m, and yet, in the experiment, the ball didn't even seem to go higher than about half a metre. Could someone tell me if I did something wrong, or if it's just that all of the little sources of error contributed to one final answer that was way off?

Also, my physics teacher said something which confused me. Since or slingshots were propped up on books, I asked him if we take this into account for the y displacement. He said it really didn't matter too much, as the books didn't change things very much. He then mentioned something about the errors being even smaller if the angle was lower, how is this so? I'm wondering how a lower initial angle of the trajectory would result in a lesser amount of error in the y displacement.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like you may have made a mistake in your calculations, as the results you got seem to be far too large for what you measured in the experiment. The most likely cause of this discrepancy is that you did not take into account air resistance, which will cause the ball to slow down and fall to the ground earlier than it would if it were in a vacuum. Air resistance will also reduce the maximum height of the ball, as it will reduce the amount of energy it has to reach its peak height. Your teacher is right that the angle of the launch will affect the amount of error. A lower angle will result in less error because it reduces the time the ball is in the air, meaning that any errors due to air resistance will be less significant.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top