(Projectile motion) Little question on a problem I posted 5 days ago

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem involving a biker launching off an entrenchment at an angle. The user derived a formula for the minimum velocity needed to land safely on a higher platform, but seeks clarification on why the maximum height of the platform must be less than a specific value, x tan(α). It is explained that if the height exceeds this value, the calculation for velocity becomes invalid, indicating no possible motion due to imaginary results. The conversation emphasizes the geometric relationship between the heights and distances involved, concluding that exceeding the height limit results in an impossible scenario for the biker's jump. Understanding these constraints is crucial for interpreting the physical implications of the problem.
Lisa...
Messages
189
Reaction score
0
I posted the following problem a few days ago: So it's about somebody on a bike who rides off an entrenchment (that's what it's called right?) with a velocity v under an angle of alpha with the ground. He's hoping to land safely on another entrenchement that's h heigher than the first one, at a distance x from the first entrenchment:
http://img372.imageshack.us/img372/8958/projectilemotion3gj.gif
For a given height h, I found the minimal velocity vmin the jumper needs to have in order to land safely on the platform at a distance x:
v0= (x/cos@) sqrt(g/2(x tan @ -h))

But how can I show that no matter what his takeoff speed is, the maximum height of the platform is hmax < x tan @. I need to interpret this result physically. Well I don't know how to do the last thing, because I know that is hmax < x tan @ the argument under the sqrt will be negative and therefore out of the domain of the sqrt function... I don't see the physical consequences... Could someone please help me?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is just a geometry problem. If you project a straight line along the lower ramp then that defines the greatest hmax.
 
Could you explain it a little bit more please ... I still don't quite get it... :( sorry
 
Draw a line extending the left ramp in your diagram ... now imagine the right ramp being taller and taller. Eventually, its top corner will be above the line you created. No matter how fast the projectile leaves the left ramp, it will not be able to land safely on the right side!
 
Ok but I need to explain with the formula v0= (x/cos@) sqrt(g/2(x tan @ -h)) why the maximum height of the platform needs to be hmax < x tan @, no matter what the v0 is. This result needs to be interpreted physically... How would I do that?
 
All I know is that if hmax > x tan @ than the argument under the sqrt will be negative and therefore out of the domain of the sqrt function... I don't see the physical consequences...
 
Lisa... said:
All I know is that if hmax > x tan @ than the argument under the sqrt will be negative and therefore out of the domain of the sqrt function... I don't see the physical consequences...
Well, this is correct because it proves that you cannot calculate v_0 when hmax>xtan@

Besides, just look at the triangle you get when i draw a straight line from the left to the right entrenchment, in the direction of v_0. Let us call that distance R.

You get that
1) h = Rsin@
2) x = Rcos@

Devide 1) by 2) and you are done

marlon

ps : vanwaar in Nederland zijt gij en waar studeert ge ?
 
Yeah but what are the physical consequences? (I don't know what they want to hear when they ask for the physical consequences)

ps: Amsterdam
 
Lisa... said:
Yeah but what are the physical consequences? (I don't know what they want to hear when they ask for the physical consequences)
Physical consequences just means that you cannot calculate the velocity in the case of hmax > xtan@. If you cannot calculate the velocity, there is NO MOTION possible because you get an imaginary number. That is all

ps: Amsterdam
Ahh, lang geleden dat ik daar nog geweest ben. Ikzelf woon in Gent , België.

Bedankt voor het antwoord

regards
marlon
 
  • #10
Ohww dat t zo simpel is :P Ik zat er helemaal stuff achter te zoeken. Bedankt in ieder geval voor je antwoord! Succes met je studie!
 
  • #11
Als je nog studeert dan he ;)
 
  • #12
Lisa... said:
Als je nog studeert dan he ;)
ik doctoreer...mmm da is nie echt meer studeren :wink:

marlon
 
Back
Top