Projectile Motion with few variables

Rebelpyr7
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cannon shoots a ball from the origin. There is a wall of 17.58 meters 67.5 meters away. The ball needs to clear the wall just barely and hit a person sitting on the ground 12 meters behind the wall. No air resistance. What is the degree the ball is launched at. No max height or initial velocities are given. Just two various lengths and height of the wall.


Homework Equations



position= x+vt+1/2at^2 (applies to both x and y)
gravity is 9.8 m/s^2 in the negative y direction
Vy=(2gh)^1/2


The Attempt at a Solution



Using properties of parabolas I know I have 4 points on the curve and I used those four points to get the quadratic equation. Using that I found the max height and used the basic formulas to find the initial velocity and used the two vectors of x and y velocity to find the angle that the ball is launched and got 59.9 degrees which is the correct answer. My professor however told me that i couldn't do it that way and had to find a different way to do this problem using what I know about projectile motion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Rebelpyr7 said:
Using properties of parabolas I know I have 4 points on the curve and I used those four points to get the quadratic equation.

Using that I found the max height and used the basic formulas to find the initial velocity and used the two vectors of x and y velocity to find the angle that the ball is launched and got 59.9 degrees which is the correct answer.

My professor however told me that i couldn't do it that way and had to find a different way to do this problem using what I know about projectile motion.

Hi Rebelpyr7! Welcome to PF! :smile:

hmm … I have some sympathy with you …

but the object of the exercise is to give you practice in using a particular method …

so you need do it the other way as well. :smile:

(in other words: I think you're both right! :wink:)
 
Problem is I don't know how to solve it any other way. The prof hasn't done anything like this in class so I was out of options.
 
Hi Rebelpyr7! :smile:
Rebelpyr7 said:
Problem is I don't know how to solve it any other way. The prof hasn't done anything like this in class so I was out of options.
Rebelpyr7 said:
My professor however told me that i couldn't do it that way and had to find a different way to do this problem using what I know about projectile motion.

"using what I know about projectile motion"? :confused:

in other words, nothing?

your professor obviously thinks (s)he has told you something!

Can you start by showing us exactly how you actually did it? :smile:
 
well what i ended up doing was doing a linear regression with my calculator and finding the quadratic formula of the parabolic curve. i then solved for max height and use that in the formula for initial velocity in the y direction. v=(2gh)^1/2 i then just plugges it into the original equation and solved for t. then I used the t to solve for the velocity in the x direction. with those two velocity vectors i solved for the degrees and got 59.9 degrees. He said what i did was wrong although it is completely sound method of doing the problem. And about him telling me something, he's an extremely bad professor. he hasnt done a single problem like this. every problem he's done had more variables. Thats where my problem is, i don't know how to solve these types of problems with virtually no information.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top