Proof involving Dirac Delta function

ozone
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
Prove that
x \frac{d}{dx} [\delta (x)] = -\delta (x)
this is problem 1.45 out of griffiths book by the way.

Homework Equations


I attempted to use integration by parts as suggest by griffiths using f = x , g' = \frac{d}{dx}
This yields x [\delta (x)] - \int \delta (x)dx

next I tried taking the derivative of both sides so that I would get my original
x \frac{d}{dx} [\delta (x)] = x \frac{d}{dx}[\delta (x)]

and so I'm back where I started. I have also tried using a definite integral so that

\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }x \frac{d}{dx}[\delta (x)] \text{dx} = \int_{-\infty }^{\infty } x[\delta (x)] \, dx - \int_{-\infty }^{\infty } [\delta (x)] \, dx

but we know that \int_{-\infty }^{\infty } x[\delta (x)] \, dx = 0 so our equation simplifies.
However this didn't get me any closer to solving the problem either.

I also have the second part of the problem regarding the step function which is defined as
\theta (x) <br /> \begin{array}{ll}<br /> \{ &amp; <br /> \begin{array}{ll}<br /> 1 &amp; x&gt;0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; x\leq 0 \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> Show that \frac{d}{dx}\theta (x) =\delta (x)

This something I can grasp by stating that

<br /> \frac{\Delta \theta }{\text{$\Delta $x}}(x=0 )\longrightarrow 1/0, \text{ as } \text{$\Delta $x}\longrightarrow 0.
which is clearly an undefined(or infinite) slope, and at every other point on this graph the derivative is going to be 0. However I want to know if this is sufficiently rigorous, and if it isn't what a step in the right direction might be.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first part you should integrate against a test function f(x). Show that integrating f(x)*x*δ'(x) is the same as integrating f(x)*(-δ(x)).
 
Alright thanks I will try that. Can you give some sort of reasoning for why this method works to get the answer? It just seems strange to me to introduce a dummy function.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top