Proof of a limit involving exponentials

  • Thread starter Thread starter phreak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the limit \(\lim_{N\to \infty} \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n=1}^N e^{2\pi i k n \alpha}=0\) for \(k \in \mathbb{Z} \setminus \{ 0 \}\) and \(\alpha \in \mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q}\). Participants explored the idea of approaching points on the unit circle and using convergence theorems with counting measure. A successful proof was established by approximating rational numbers to demonstrate that the limit approaches zero as \(N\) increases. The discussion emphasizes the importance of rigorous mathematical reasoning in handling limits involving exponentials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with complex exponentials
  • Knowledge of rational and irrational numbers
  • Basic concepts of convergence theorems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complex exponentials and their behavior on the unit circle
  • Learn about convergence theorems in measure theory
  • Explore proofs involving limits of sequences and series
  • Investigate the implications of rational approximations in real analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying real analysis, and anyone interested in advanced limit proofs involving complex numbers and exponential functions.

phreak
Messages
133
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Given [tex]k\in \mathbb{Z} \setminus \{ 0 \}[/tex], prove that [tex]\lim_{n\to \infty} \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n=1}^N e^{2\pi i k n \alpha}=0[/tex], for all [tex]\alpha \in \mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q}[/tex].

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I had an idea, but I'm not sure how well it works. Even if it did, I'm not sure how to make it rigorous. Basically, my idea was to say that you work your way around the unit circle, and that whenever we come arbitrarily close to hitting the same point again, the sum (between the two points) gets arbitrarily close to zero. Am I on the right track?

Edit: Alternately, could we use some convergence theorem using counting measure? Also, the limit is supposed to be 0, not 1. I changed it in the code, but it isn't working.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phreak said:
we come arbitrarily close to hitting the same point again, the sum (between the two points) gets arbitrarily close to zero. Am I on the right track?
This sounds like a reasonable line of attack.

Let's idealize for a bit (which may or may not help). For simplicity, let's fix a particular point, say, 1. What would happen if, after some number P of steps you really did return to 1?

(i.e. what if [itex]\alpha \in \mathbb{Q}[/itex], and [itex]k \alpha \notin \mathbb{Z}[/itex])

Can you prove the limit goes to zero in this special case?


Also, the limit is supposed to be 0, not 1. I changed it in the code, but it isn't working.
You need to reload the image. Reloading the page might not do that, depending on your browser and its settings.
 
Ok, I proved it. Thanks a lot for the help.

(For the curious: You prove it for \alpha k rational. Then you pick r = p/q \in \Q s.t. |\alpha k - p/q | < \epsilon. You do a lot of clever approximation and you get that 1/N * the sum \le (2\epsilon+q)/N, which goes to 0 as N goes to infinity.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K