Proof of Convergence: Limit (n!)/(n^n) = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter tonebone10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence Proof
AI Thread Summary
The limit of (n!)/(n^n) as n approaches infinity is proven to be 0 using the definition of convergence. By expressing (n!)/(n^n) as a product of terms, each of which approaches 0, it is shown that for any small epsilon, there exists a natural number N such that for all n greater than or equal to N, the absolute value of (n!)/(n^n) is less than epsilon. Specifically, the expression simplifies to (1/n)*(2/n)*...*(n/n), where each term converges to 0. This establishes that the sequence converges to 0, confirming the limit. Thus, the proof is complete and aligns with the convergence definition.
tonebone10
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
How can I use the following definition to prove that the limit as n --> infinity of (n!)/(n^n) is 0 :

the sequence {an}-->a if
For all epsilon>0, there exists an N element of natural nos. such that for all n> or = to N, abs value(an-a)<epsilon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's really the hard way!

Any way, notice that n!= n*(n-1)*(n-2)*...*(3)(2)(1) with n factors while
nn= (n)*(n)*(n)*...*(n)(n)(n) also with n factors. That means that
n!/nn can be written as a product of n factors: (n/n)((n-1)/n)((n-2)/n)...(3/n)(2/n)(1/n). Since the first term is 1 and all others are less than 1,
n!/nn< 1/n. It should be easy to find N such that if n> N, |1/n|< epsilon!
 


To prove that the limit as n --> infinity of (n!)/(n^n) is 0, we can use the definition of convergence of a sequence. According to the definition, a sequence {an} converges to a limit a if for any given small number epsilon, there exists a natural number N such that for all n greater than or equal to N, the absolute value of (an - a) is less than epsilon.

In this case, we want to show that as n approaches infinity, the value of (n!)/(n^n) gets closer and closer to 0. So, let's choose an arbitrary small number epsilon and show that there exists a natural number N such that for all n greater than or equal to N, the absolute value of (n!)/(n^n) is less than epsilon.

First, we can simplify the expression (n!)/(n^n) to (1/n)*(2/n)*...*(n/n). Now, since n is approaching infinity, we know that each term in this product will approach 0. So, for any given epsilon, we can choose N to be a natural number greater than 1/epsilon. This means that for all n greater than or equal to N, each term in the product (1/n)*(2/n)*...*(n/n) will be less than or equal to 1/epsilon. Therefore, the absolute value of (n!)/(n^n) will be less than epsilon, which proves that the limit as n --> infinity of (n!)/(n^n) is 0.

In conclusion, we have shown that for any given small number epsilon, there exists a natural number N such that for all n greater than or equal to N, the absolute value of (n!)/(n^n) is less than epsilon. This satisfies the definition of convergence, thus proving that the limit as n --> infinity of (n!)/(n^n) is 0.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top