Proof of Divergence Formula in Spherical Coordinates

eliasds
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello - I'm supposed to derive the divergence formula for spherical coordinates by carrying out the surface integrals of the surface of the volume in the figure (the figure is a piece of a sphere similar to a box but with curves). The radial coord is r. The polar angle is \varphi and the azimuthal angle is \theta.The divergence formula is easy enought to look up: DIV(F) = \nabla\bulletF =

\frac{1}{r^{2}}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}r^{2}F_{r}+\frac{1}{rsin\varphi}\frac{\partial}{\partial \varphi}\left( sin\varphi F_{\varphi}\right) + \frac{1}{rsin\varphi}\frac{\partial F_{\theta}}{\partial\theta}

And the volume of the little piece of a sphere is easy enough:
r^{2}sin\varphi \Delta r \Delta\varphi\Delta\theta

But when I try to set up the limits for each side as the volume goes to zero I never end up with the first and second sin\varphi in the equation. Supposedly I'm supposed to multiply by a sin\theta but I don't see why.

What I end up with is:
\frac{\partial}{\partial r}F_{r}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial \varphi}\left( F_{\varphi}\right) + \frac{1}{rsin\varphi}\frac{\partial F_{\theta}}{\partial\theta}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How is polar angle different from azimuth angle?
 
Phi is the angle in the page, and the theta is the angle out of the page.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top