Proof of Venn Diagram for Sets A, B & C

leilei
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Proof for all sets A, B, and C:
A complement U B complement = (A Intercept B) complement.

can someone help??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just to the typical point-wise argument. Let x be an element of the LHS and show that implies x is an element of the RHS. Then let x be an element of the RHS and show that implies x is an element of the LHS.

As you've already realized, you can draw a venn diagram (Who was this 'venn' by the way? I've always wondered that) to help yourself connect the dots.
 
rodigee said:
As you've already realized, you can draw a venn diagram (Who was this 'venn' by the way? I've always wondered that) to help yourself connect the dots.

John Venn was a logician who took the standard Euler Diagrams and improved upon them by overlapping and requiring that the overlap be the Union, and that all elements of the sets be constrained to exist in some area of the diagram.

Euler diagrams did not have to overlap, the circles could exist separate from each other. Venn's improvement assisted the logicians with understanding what the Union and disjunctions of sets meant.

Mathematicians then realized their usefulness began using them as well.

Wiki does both okay, but not great:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_venn
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venn_diagram
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top