Proof that the moon is closer to Earth than the sun

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods to demonstrate to a child that the moon is closer to Earth than the sun. Participants explore various approaches, including visual aids, observational techniques, and historical references, while considering the effectiveness of different proofs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest using eclipses as a proof, emphasizing the importance of witnessing a solar eclipse and a lunar eclipse for direct observation.
  • Others propose that the phases of the moon can serve as evidence, arguing that if the sun were closer, the moon would always appear fully illuminated.
  • A participant mentions Aristarchus' calculation of the distance ratio between the sun and moon, noting that it is off by a factor of 20 due to measurement imprecision, and suggests using geometry to illustrate this concept.
  • One participant recommends a hands-on approach by creating right triangles to visualize the distances involved, suggesting that this method allows for empirical understanding.
  • Another participant advocates for using simple experiments with a light source and a ball to demonstrate the phases of the moon in a more tangible way.
  • Some participants reflect on the historical context of astronomy, suggesting that elementary astronomy could be better integrated into education to help students understand these concepts through direct observation.
  • One participant mentions that the fact humans have traveled to the moon and sent spacecraft near the sun serves as a form of proof.
  • Another suggests showing a video of a solar eclipse as a clear demonstration of the moon's position relative to the sun.
  • A participant shares a personal anecdote about experiencing the moon's phases and the sun's position, highlighting the emotional impact of direct observation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the effectiveness of visual and experiential methods to demonstrate the moon's proximity to Earth compared to the sun. However, there are multiple competing views on the best approach to convey this information, and no consensus is reached on a singular method.

Contextual Notes

Some methods proposed rely on specific conditions, such as the timing of eclipses or the availability of materials for experiments. Additionally, the discussion reflects a variety of assumptions about the audience's prior knowledge and the definitions of "proof."

  • #31
Monsterboy said:
No , because you can actually take her to Fresno, if needed you can take her to any other place in the world if you can afford it.
There are too many places on Earth to visit all of them. And booking a flight every time a question about a town comes up... even if you can afford it it does not sound practical. Sometimes it is more reasonable to trust evidence collected from others.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
mfb said:
There are too many places on Earth to visit all of them. And booking a flight every time a question about a town comes up... even if you can afford it it does not sound practical. Sometimes it is more reasonable to trust evidence collected from others.
Yes , I just thought that telling a 9 year old that the fact that some people landed on the moon and some spacecraft s were sent to study the sun is the proof to show that moon is closer to the Earth than the sun, is not the most appropriate way to "prove " it, because she will have to blindly trust the "evidence" she may not understand yet and will lead to questions which will require you to prove that the moon landings did happen in the first place ,which will just complicate and prolong the proof for the original question. In #21 Shyan explained it well.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
Monsterboy said:
Yes , I just thought that telling a 9 year old that the fact that some people landed on the moon and some spacecraft s were sent to study the sun is the proof to show that moon is closer to the Earth than the sun, is not the most appropriate way to "prove " it, because she will have to blindly trust the "evidence" she may not understand yet and will lead to questions which will require you to prove that the moon landings did happen in the first place ,which will just complicate and prolong the proof for the original question. In #21 Shyan explained it well.

She'll also ask why you've never visited the quiche restaurant down the street, but ate at the barbecue place across town, instead.

And, unless you're a family that actually travels the world, what's the difference between Atlantis and Paris?

I think the demo with the light and phases is something a kid would understand. Watching a solar eclipse would also be great because... well, because solar eclipses are cool! Even partial eclipses.

But, oh, why didn't she ask this question in 2004 or 2012 when you could have shown her the transit of Venus? That was so cool on so many levels - such as how humans finally figured out how far the Earth was from the Sun.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #34
Showing the phases of the moon with a tennis ball and flashlight should make things clear about how the moon goes through its phases, and why it does so. Visibly showing that it HAS to go between the Earth and the Sun at some point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K